Development of the\nCO<sub>2</sub> Adsorption Model\non Porous Adsorbent Materials Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Porous adsorbents have common characteristics, such as\nhigh porosity\nand a large specific surface area. These characteristics, attributed\nto the internal structure of the material, significantly affect their\nadsorption performance. In this research study, we created a data\nset and collected data points from porous adsorbents (2789) from 21\npublished papers, including carbon-based, porous polymers, metal–organic\nframeworks (MOFs), and zeolites, to understand their characteristics\nfor CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption. Different machine learning (ML) algorithms,\nsuch as NN, MLP-GWO, XGBoost, RF, DT, and SVM, have been applied to\ndisplay the CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption performance as a function of\ncharacteristics and adsorption isotherm parameters. XGBoost was selected\nas the best ML algorithm due to its highest accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9980; MSE = 0.0001). The predicted results revealed\nthat the adsorption pressure parameter is the most effective in all\nof the mentioned porous adsorbents. With regard to materials type,\nwhile carbon-based materials require higher pressures for a more effective\nCO<sub>2</sub> adsorption, MOFs exhibit a higher potential for adsorbing\nCO<sub>2</sub> under lower pressure conditions. The study also revealed\nthat carbon-based adsorbents, zeolites, and porous polymers with smaller\npore diameters demonstrate a high level of CO<sub>2</sub> uptake.\nIn contrast, the adsorption performance of MOFs does not show a consistent\ntrend with respect to pore sizes. Also, in all adsorbents, the effect\nof a pore size smaller than 1 nm on more CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption\nwas evident.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c01465.s002
Primary Topic
Covalent Organic Framework Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the\nCO2 Adsorption Model\non Porous Adsorbent Materials Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Figshare
Covalent Organic Framework Applications
article

Development of the\nCO2 Adsorption Model\non Porous Adsorbent Materials Using Machine Learning Algorithms

article en

Abstract

Porous adsorbents have common characteristics, such as\nhigh porosity\nand a large specific surface area. These characteristics, attributed\nto the internal structure of the material, significantly affect their\nadsorption performance. In this research study, we created a data\nset and collected data points from porous adsorbents (2789) from 21\npublished papers, including carbon-based, porous polymers, metal–organic\nframeworks (MOFs), and zeolites, to understand their characteristics\nfor CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption. Different machine learning (ML) algorithms,\nsuch as NN, MLP-GWO, XGBoost, RF, DT, and SVM, have been applied to\ndisplay the CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption performance as a function of\ncharacteristics and adsorption isotherm parameters. XGBoost was selected\nas the best ML algorithm due to its highest accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9980; MSE = 0.0001). The predicted results revealed\nthat the adsorption pressure parameter is the most effective in all\nof the mentioned porous adsorbents. With regard to materials type,\nwhile carbon-based materials require higher pressures for a more effective\nCO<sub>2</sub> adsorption, MOFs exhibit a higher potential for adsorbing\nCO<sub>2</sub> under lower pressure conditions. The study also revealed\nthat carbon-based adsorbents, zeolites, and porous polymers with smaller\npore diameters demonstrate a high level of CO<sub>2</sub> uptake.\nIn contrast, the adsorption performance of MOFs does not show a consistent\ntrend with respect to pore sizes. Also, in all adsorbents, the effect\nof a pore size smaller than 1 nm on more CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption\nwas evident.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Covalent Organic Framework Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.