Identification\nof FGG as a Biomarker in Early Gastric\nCancer via Tissue Proteomics and Clinical Verification

Early and accurate diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) is\nessential\nfor reducing mortality and improving patient well-being. However,\nmethods for the early diagnosis of GC are still lacking. In this study,\nby isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ),\nwe identified 336 proteins that overlapped among the upregulated differentially\nexpressed proteins (DEPs) in early gastric cancer (EGC) versus progressive\ngastric cancer (PGC), upregulated DEPs in EGC versus nongastric cancer\n(NGC), and nonsignificant proteins in EGC versus NGC. These DEPs were\ninvolved primarily in the neutrophil-related immune response. Network\nanalysis of proteins and pathways revealed that fibrinogen α\n(FGA), β (FGB), and γ (FGG) are candidates for distinguishing\nEGC. Furthermore, parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), immunohistochemistry\n(IHC), and Western blot (WB) assays of clinical samples confirmed\nthat, compared with that in PGC and NGC, only FGG was uniquely and\nsignificantly upregulated in the gastric mucosa of EGC. Our results\ndemonstrated that FGG in the gastric mucosa could be a novel biomarker\nto diagnose EGC patients via endoscopy.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00624.s001
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification\nof FGG as a Biomarker in Early Gastric\nCancer via Tissue Proteomics and Clinical Verification

Figshare
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Identification\nof FGG as a Biomarker in Early Gastric\nCancer via Tissue Proteomics and Clinical Verification

article en

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) is\nessential\nfor reducing mortality and improving patient well-being. However,\nmethods for the early diagnosis of GC are still lacking. In this study,\nby isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ),\nwe identified 336 proteins that overlapped among the upregulated differentially\nexpressed proteins (DEPs) in early gastric cancer (EGC) versus progressive\ngastric cancer (PGC), upregulated DEPs in EGC versus nongastric cancer\n(NGC), and nonsignificant proteins in EGC versus NGC. These DEPs were\ninvolved primarily in the neutrophil-related immune response. Network\nanalysis of proteins and pathways revealed that fibrinogen α\n(FGA), β (FGB), and γ (FGG) are candidates for distinguishing\nEGC. Furthermore, parallel reaction monitoring (PRM), immunohistochemistry\n(IHC), and Western blot (WB) assays of clinical samples confirmed\nthat, compared with that in PGC and NGC, only FGG was uniquely and\nsignificantly upregulated in the gastric mucosa of EGC. Our results\ndemonstrated that FGG in the gastric mucosa could be a novel biomarker\nto diagnose EGC patients via endoscopy.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.