Revisiting HeterolyticCleavage Mechanism of MethaneC–H Bond Activation over Metal Oxide Surfaces

The understanding of C–H bond activation could facilitate the design of improved catalysts for the conversion of methane to valuable products. However, its mechanism remains controversial, particularly with regard to metal oxides. This study aims to shed light on this issue by systematically investigating methane C–H bond activation across various pristine metal oxide surfaces and revisiting the prevailing heterolytic cleavage mechanism. It is found that the so-called “heterolytic cleavage mechanism” for methane activation could be classified into two distinct mechanisms on bare metal oxide surfaces: the real heterolytic cleavage mechanism over flat nonreducible alkali and alkaline-earth metal oxide surfaces (N-MOSs) and a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT)-enabled hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) mechanism over reducible metal oxide surfaces (R-MOSs). The dominant mechanism is determined by the Coulomb interaction between methane and the surface at the transition state and the energy of LMCT (<i>E</i><sub>LMCT</sub>). Strong Coulomb interactions favor the heterolytic cleavage mechanism on bare N-MOSs, while the opposite favors the LMCT-enabled HAT mechanism on R-MOSs. Nevertheless, the heterolytic cleavage mechanism might have difficulty occurring under the reaction conditions of methane oxidation since the strong chemisorption of dioxygen over alkali and alkaline metal oxide surfaces would render the methane far from the surface, significantly weakening the Coulomb interaction. Doping can manipulate the electronic structure of lattice oxygen, potentially reducing <i>E</i><sub>LMCT</sub> and even bypassing LMCT to directly generate reactive oxygen radicals, thus accelerating C–H activation. Additionally, these distinct mechanisms can influence subsequent steps, such as C–O coupling. C–H bond activation through the LMCT-enabled mechanism would be a prerequisite to trigger C–O coupling. This study provides valuable insights into the design of targeted catalysts with desired activity and selectivity for efficient and controlled methane conversion.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00138.s001
Primary Topic
Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting HeterolyticCleavage Mechanism of MethaneC–H Bond Activation over Metal Oxide Surfaces

Figshare
Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
article

Revisiting HeterolyticCleavage Mechanism of MethaneC–H Bond Activation over Metal Oxide Surfaces

article en

Abstract

The understanding of C–H bond activation could facilitate the design of improved catalysts for the conversion of methane to valuable products. However, its mechanism remains controversial, particularly with regard to metal oxides. This study aims to shed light on this issue by systematically investigating methane C–H bond activation across various pristine metal oxide surfaces and revisiting the prevailing heterolytic cleavage mechanism. It is found that the so-called “heterolytic cleavage mechanism” for methane activation could be classified into two distinct mechanisms on bare metal oxide surfaces: the real heterolytic cleavage mechanism over flat nonreducible alkali and alkaline-earth metal oxide surfaces (N-MOSs) and a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT)-enabled hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) mechanism over reducible metal oxide surfaces (R-MOSs). The dominant mechanism is determined by the Coulomb interaction between methane and the surface at the transition state and the energy of LMCT (<i>E</i><sub>LMCT</sub>). Strong Coulomb interactions favor the heterolytic cleavage mechanism on bare N-MOSs, while the opposite favors the LMCT-enabled HAT mechanism on R-MOSs. Nevertheless, the heterolytic cleavage mechanism might have difficulty occurring under the reaction conditions of methane oxidation since the strong chemisorption of dioxygen over alkali and alkaline metal oxide surfaces would render the methane far from the surface, significantly weakening the Coulomb interaction. Doping can manipulate the electronic structure of lattice oxygen, potentially reducing <i>E</i><sub>LMCT</sub> and even bypassing LMCT to directly generate reactive oxygen radicals, thus accelerating C–H activation. Additionally, these distinct mechanisms can influence subsequent steps, such as C–O coupling. C–H bond activation through the LMCT-enabled mechanism would be a prerequisite to trigger C–O coupling. This study provides valuable insights into the design of targeted catalysts with desired activity and selectivity for efficient and controlled methane conversion.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting HeterolyticCleavage Mechanism of MethaneC–H Bond Activation over Metal Oxide Surfaces · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS