Probing the\nHistamine H<sub>1</sub> Receptor Binding\nSite to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics

Analysis of structure-kinetic relationships (SKR) can\ncontribute\nto an improved understanding of receptor–ligand interactions.\nHere, fragment <b>1</b> (4-(2-benzylphenoxy)-1-methylpiperidine)\nwas used in different fragment growing approaches to mimic the putative\nbinding mode of the long residence time (RT) ligands olopatadine,\nacrivastine, and levocetirizine at the histamine H<sub>1</sub> receptor\n(H<sub>1</sub>R). SKR analyses reveal that introduction of a carboxylic\nacid moiety can increase RT at H<sub>1</sub>R up to 11-fold. Ligand\nefficiency (LE) decreases upon the introduction of the negatively\ncharged group, whereas kinetic efficiency (KE) increases up to 8.5-fold.\nThe olopatadine/acrivastine mimics give up to 15-fold differences\nin the RT, while the levocetirizine mimics afford similar RTs with\nonly a 3-fold difference. Therefore, the levocetirizine mimics are\nless sensitive to structural changes. This study illustrates that\nfor H<sub>1</sub>R, there are several ways to increase RT but the\ndifferent strategies differ significantly in SKR.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02043.s001
Primary Topic
Mast cells and histamine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probing the\nHistamine H1 Receptor Binding\nSite to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics

Figshare
Mast cells and histamine
article

Probing the\nHistamine H1 Receptor Binding\nSite to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics

article en

Abstract

Analysis of structure-kinetic relationships (SKR) can\ncontribute\nto an improved understanding of receptor–ligand interactions.\nHere, fragment <b>1</b> (4-(2-benzylphenoxy)-1-methylpiperidine)\nwas used in different fragment growing approaches to mimic the putative\nbinding mode of the long residence time (RT) ligands olopatadine,\nacrivastine, and levocetirizine at the histamine H<sub>1</sub> receptor\n(H<sub>1</sub>R). SKR analyses reveal that introduction of a carboxylic\nacid moiety can increase RT at H<sub>1</sub>R up to 11-fold. Ligand\nefficiency (LE) decreases upon the introduction of the negatively\ncharged group, whereas kinetic efficiency (KE) increases up to 8.5-fold.\nThe olopatadine/acrivastine mimics give up to 15-fold differences\nin the RT, while the levocetirizine mimics afford similar RTs with\nonly a 3-fold difference. Therefore, the levocetirizine mimics are\nless sensitive to structural changes. This study illustrates that\nfor H<sub>1</sub>R, there are several ways to increase RT but the\ndifferent strategies differ significantly in SKR.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Mast cells and histamine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Probing the\nHistamine H<sub>1</sub> Receptor Binding\nSite to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS