Exploring the Impact of Physiological C‑Terminal\nTruncation on α‑Synuclein Conformations to Unveil Mechanisms\nRegulating Pathological Aggregation

Emerging\nevidence suggests that physiological C-terminal truncation\nof α-synuclein (αS) plays a critical role in regulating\nliquid–liquid phase separation and promoting amyloid aggregation,\nprocesses implicated in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s\ndisease (PD). However, the molecular mechanisms through which C-terminal\ntruncation influences αS conformation and modulates its aggregation\nremain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the impact\nof C-terminal truncation on αS conformational dynamics by comparing\nfull-length αS<sub>1–140</sub> with truncated αS<sub>1–103</sub> monomers using atomistic discrete molecular dynamics\nsimulations. Our findings revealed that both αS<sub>1–140</sub> and αS<sub>1–103</sub> primarily adopted helical conformations\naround residues 7–32, while residues 36–95, located\nin the second half of the N-terminal and NAC domains, predominantly\nformed a dynamic β-sheet core. The C-terminus of αS<sub>1–140</sub> was largely unstructured and dynamically wrapped\naround the β-sheet core. While residues 1–95 exhibited\nsimilar secondary structure propensities in both αS<sub>1–140</sub> and αS<sub>1–103</sub>, the dynamic capping by the\nC-terminus in αS<sub>1–140</sub> slightly enhanced β-sheet\nformation around residues 36–95. In contrast, key aggregation-driving\nregions (residues 2–9, 36–42, 45–57, and 68–78)\nwere dynamically shielded by the C-terminus in αS<sub>1–140</sub>, reducing their exposure and potentially preventing interpeptide\ninteractions that drive aggregation. C-terminal truncation, on the\nother hand, increased the exposed surface area of these aggregation-prone\nregions, thereby enhancing interpeptide interactions, phase separation,\nand amyloid aggregation. Overall, our simulations provide valuable\ninsights into the conformational effects of C-terminal truncation\non αS and its role in promoting pathological aggregation.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01839.s001
Primary Topic
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Impact of Physiological C‑Terminal\nTruncation on α‑Synuclein Conformations to Unveil Mechanisms\nRegulating Pathological Aggregation

Figshare
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Exploring the Impact of Physiological C‑Terminal\nTruncation on α‑Synuclein Conformations to Unveil Mechanisms\nRegulating Pathological Aggregation

article en

Abstract

Emerging\nevidence suggests that physiological C-terminal truncation\nof α-synuclein (αS) plays a critical role in regulating\nliquid–liquid phase separation and promoting amyloid aggregation,\nprocesses implicated in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s\ndisease (PD). However, the molecular mechanisms through which C-terminal\ntruncation influences αS conformation and modulates its aggregation\nremain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the impact\nof C-terminal truncation on αS conformational dynamics by comparing\nfull-length αS<sub>1–140</sub> with truncated αS<sub>1–103</sub> monomers using atomistic discrete molecular dynamics\nsimulations. Our findings revealed that both αS<sub>1–140</sub> and αS<sub>1–103</sub> primarily adopted helical conformations\naround residues 7–32, while residues 36–95, located\nin the second half of the N-terminal and NAC domains, predominantly\nformed a dynamic β-sheet core. The C-terminus of αS<sub>1–140</sub> was largely unstructured and dynamically wrapped\naround the β-sheet core. While residues 1–95 exhibited\nsimilar secondary structure propensities in both αS<sub>1–140</sub> and αS<sub>1–103</sub>, the dynamic capping by the\nC-terminus in αS<sub>1–140</sub> slightly enhanced β-sheet\nformation around residues 36–95. In contrast, key aggregation-driving\nregions (residues 2–9, 36–42, 45–57, and 68–78)\nwere dynamically shielded by the C-terminus in αS<sub>1–140</sub>, reducing their exposure and potentially preventing interpeptide\ninteractions that drive aggregation. C-terminal truncation, on the\nother hand, increased the exposed surface area of these aggregation-prone\nregions, thereby enhancing interpeptide interactions, phase separation,\nand amyloid aggregation. Overall, our simulations provide valuable\ninsights into the conformational effects of C-terminal truncation\non αS and its role in promoting pathological aggregation.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.