Can We Ever Developan Ideal RNA Force Field? LessonsLearned from Simulations of the UUCG RNA Tetraloop and Other Systems

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are an important and well-established tool for investigating RNA structural dynamics, but their accuracy relies heavily on the quality of the employed force field (<i>ff</i>). In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of widely used pair-additive and polarizable RNA <i>ff</i>s using the challenging UUCG tetraloop (TL) benchmark system. Extensive standard MD simulations, initiated from the NMR structure of the 14-mer UUCG TL, revealed that most <i>ff</i>s did not maintain the native state, instead favoring alternative loop conformations. Notably, three very recent variants of pair-additive <i>ff</i>s, OL3<sub>CP</sub>–gHBfix21, DES-Amber, and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub>, successfully preserved the native structure over a 10 × 20 μs time scale. To further assess these <i>ff</i>s, we performed enhanced sampling folding simulations of the shorter 8-mer UUCG TL, starting from the single-stranded conformation. Estimated folding free energies (Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>fold</sub>) varied significantly among these three <i>ff</i>s, with values of 0.0 ± 0.6, 2.4 ± 0.8, and 7.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol for OL3<sub>CP</sub>–gHBfix21, DES-Amber, and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub>, respectively. The Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>fold</sub> value predicted by the OL3<sub>CP</sub>–gHBfix21 <i>ff</i> was closest to experimental estimates, ranging from −1.6 to −0.7 kcal/mol. In contrast, the higher Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>fold</sub> values obtained using DES-Amber and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub> were unexpected, suggesting that key interactions are inaccurately described in the folded, unfolded, or misfolded ensembles. These discrepancies led us to further test DES-Amber and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub> <i>ff</i>s on additional RNA and DNA systems, where further performance issues were observed. Our results emphasize the complexity of accurately modeling RNA dynamics and suggest that creating an RNA <i>ff</i> capable of reliably performing across a wide range of RNA systems remains extremely challenging. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the capabilities of current RNA <i>ff</i>s and highlights key areas for future <i>ff</i> development.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01357.s001
Primary Topic
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can We Ever Developan Ideal RNA Force Field? LessonsLearned from Simulations of the UUCG RNA Tetraloop and Other Systems

Figshare
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
article

Can We Ever Developan Ideal RNA Force Field? LessonsLearned from Simulations of the UUCG RNA Tetraloop and Other Systems

article en

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are an important and well-established tool for investigating RNA structural dynamics, but their accuracy relies heavily on the quality of the employed force field (<i>ff</i>). In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of widely used pair-additive and polarizable RNA <i>ff</i>s using the challenging UUCG tetraloop (TL) benchmark system. Extensive standard MD simulations, initiated from the NMR structure of the 14-mer UUCG TL, revealed that most <i>ff</i>s did not maintain the native state, instead favoring alternative loop conformations. Notably, three very recent variants of pair-additive <i>ff</i>s, OL3<sub>CP</sub>–gHBfix21, DES-Amber, and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub>, successfully preserved the native structure over a 10 × 20 μs time scale. To further assess these <i>ff</i>s, we performed enhanced sampling folding simulations of the shorter 8-mer UUCG TL, starting from the single-stranded conformation. Estimated folding free energies (Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>fold</sub>) varied significantly among these three <i>ff</i>s, with values of 0.0 ± 0.6, 2.4 ± 0.8, and 7.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol for OL3<sub>CP</sub>–gHBfix21, DES-Amber, and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub>, respectively. The Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>fold</sub> value predicted by the OL3<sub>CP</sub>–gHBfix21 <i>ff</i> was closest to experimental estimates, ranging from −1.6 to −0.7 kcal/mol. In contrast, the higher Δ<i>G</i>°<sub>fold</sub> values obtained using DES-Amber and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub> were unexpected, suggesting that key interactions are inaccurately described in the folded, unfolded, or misfolded ensembles. These discrepancies led us to further test DES-Amber and OL3<sub>R2.7</sub> <i>ff</i>s on additional RNA and DNA systems, where further performance issues were observed. Our results emphasize the complexity of accurately modeling RNA dynamics and suggest that creating an RNA <i>ff</i> capable of reliably performing across a wide range of RNA systems remains extremely challenging. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the capabilities of current RNA <i>ff</i>s and highlights key areas for future <i>ff</i> development.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can We Ever Developan Ideal RNA Force Field? LessonsLearned from Simulations of the UUCG RNA Tetraloop and Other Systems · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS