An Experimental\nStudy of the Effects of Waste-Gas\nComposition and Crosswind on Non-assisted Flares Using a Novel Indoor\nTesting Approach

Non-assisted\nflares are a significant fraction of the flares in\nuse today, but there are few studies at real-world conditions. The\ncurrent work presents a novel indoor testing facility for characterizing\nnon-assisted flares including the effects of crosswind. Multiple flare\ndesigns were tested using flare gas flow rates from 1.8 to 113 thousand\nstandard cubic feet per day (MSCFD) with natural gas and propane at\ncrosswind speeds from 0 to 13.1 miles per hour (MPH). Combustion efficiency\n(CE) and destruction removal efficiency of methane (DRE<sub>CH<sub>4</sub></sub>) were determined for all operating conditions. CE >\n98% was observed for low crosswind conditions for all flare geometries;\nhowever, the 3-in. pipe flare underperformed (CE < 96.5%) for natural\ngas at higher wind speeds and lower flare gas flow rates (e.g., 6.8\nMSCFD and >4.6 MPH). Engineered burners significantly improved\nperformance.\nThe results are discussed in the context of EPA assumptions, prior\npipe flare wind-tunnel studies, and proposed scaling relations.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04067.s001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Experimental\nStudy of the Effects of Waste-Gas\nComposition and Crosswind on Non-assisted Flares Using a Novel Indoor\nTesting Approach

1 citations
Figshare
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
0.36
article

An Experimental\nStudy of the Effects of Waste-Gas\nComposition and Crosswind on Non-assisted Flares Using a Novel Indoor\nTesting Approach

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Non-assisted\nflares are a significant fraction of the flares in\nuse today, but there are few studies at real-world conditions. The\ncurrent work presents a novel indoor testing facility for characterizing\nnon-assisted flares including the effects of crosswind. Multiple flare\ndesigns were tested using flare gas flow rates from 1.8 to 113 thousand\nstandard cubic feet per day (MSCFD) with natural gas and propane at\ncrosswind speeds from 0 to 13.1 miles per hour (MPH). Combustion efficiency\n(CE) and destruction removal efficiency of methane (DRE<sub>CH<sub>4</sub></sub>) were determined for all operating conditions. CE >\n98% was observed for low crosswind conditions for all flare geometries;\nhowever, the 3-in. pipe flare underperformed (CE < 96.5%) for natural\ngas at higher wind speeds and lower flare gas flow rates (e.g., 6.8\nMSCFD and >4.6 MPH). Engineered burners significantly improved\nperformance.\nThe results are discussed in the context of EPA assumptions, prior\npipe flare wind-tunnel studies, and proposed scaling relations.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Experimental\nStudy of the Effects of Waste-Gas\nComposition and Crosswind on Non-assisted Flares Using a Novel Indoor\nTesting Approach · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS