Revisiting the\nThickness of the Air–Water Interface\nfrom Two Extremes of Interface Hydrogen Bond Dynamics

The air–water interface plays a crucial role in\nmany aspects\nof science because of its unique properties, such as a two-dimensional\nhydrogen bond (HB) network and completely different HB dynamics compared\nto bulk water. However, accurately determining the boundary of interfacial\nand bulk water, that is, the thickness of the air–water interface,\nstill challenges experimentalists. Various simulation-based methods\nhave been developed to estimate the thickness, converging on a range\nof approximately 3–10 (Å). In this study, we introduce\na novel approach, grounded in density functional theory-based molecular\ndynamics and deep potential molecular dynamics simulations, to measure\nthe air–water interface thickness, offering a different perspective\nbased on prior research. To capture realistic HB dynamics in the air–water\ninterface, two extreme scenarios of the interface HB dynamics are\nobtained: one underestimates the interface HB dynamics, while the\nother overestimates it. Surprisingly, our results suggest that the\ninterface HB dynamics in both scenarios converges as the thickness\nof the air–water interface increases to 4 (Å). This convergence\npoint, indicative of the realistic interface thickness, is also validated\nby our calculation of anisotropic decay of OH stretch and the free\nOH dynamics at the air–water interface.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00457.s001
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the\nThickness of the Air–Water Interface\nfrom Two Extremes of Interface Hydrogen Bond Dynamics

Figshare
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
article

Revisiting the\nThickness of the Air–Water Interface\nfrom Two Extremes of Interface Hydrogen Bond Dynamics

article en

Abstract

The air–water interface plays a crucial role in\nmany aspects\nof science because of its unique properties, such as a two-dimensional\nhydrogen bond (HB) network and completely different HB dynamics compared\nto bulk water. However, accurately determining the boundary of interfacial\nand bulk water, that is, the thickness of the air–water interface,\nstill challenges experimentalists. Various simulation-based methods\nhave been developed to estimate the thickness, converging on a range\nof approximately 3–10 (Å). In this study, we introduce\na novel approach, grounded in density functional theory-based molecular\ndynamics and deep potential molecular dynamics simulations, to measure\nthe air–water interface thickness, offering a different perspective\nbased on prior research. To capture realistic HB dynamics in the air–water\ninterface, two extreme scenarios of the interface HB dynamics are\nobtained: one underestimates the interface HB dynamics, while the\nother overestimates it. Surprisingly, our results suggest that the\ninterface HB dynamics in both scenarios converges as the thickness\nof the air–water interface increases to 4 (Å). This convergence\npoint, indicative of the realistic interface thickness, is also validated\nby our calculation of anisotropic decay of OH stretch and the free\nOH dynamics at the air–water interface.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting the\nThickness of the Air–Water Interface\nfrom Two Extremes of Interface Hydrogen Bond Dynamics · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS