<i>In\nSitu</i>, Fusion-Free, Multiplexed\nDetection of Small Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs for Cancer Diagnostics

Tumor-derived small extracellular vesicle (sEV) microRNAs\n(miRNAs)\nare emerging biomarkers for cancer diagnostics. Conventional sEV miRNA\ndetection methods necessitate the lysis of sEVs, rendering them laborious\nand time-consuming and potentially leading to damage or loss of miRNAs.\nMembrane fusion-based <i>in situ</i> detection of sEV miRNAs\ninvolves the preparation of probe-loaded vesicles (<i>e.g.</i>, liposomes or cellular vesicles), which are typically sophisticated\nand require specialist equipment. Membrane perforation methods employ\nchemical treatments that can induce severe miRNA degradation or leaks.\nInspired by previous studies that loaded nucleic acids into EVs or\ncells using hydrophobic tethers for therapeutic applications, herein,\nwe repurposed this strategy by conjugating a hydrophobic tether onto\nmolecular beacons to aid their transportation into sEVs, allowing\nfor <i>in situ</i> detection of miRNAs in a fusion-free\nand multiplexing manner. This method enables simultaneous detection\nof multiple miRNA species within serum-derived sEVs for the diagnosis\nof prostate cancer, breast cancer, and gastric cancer with an accuracy\nof 83.3%, 81.8%, and 100%, respectively, in a cohort of 66 individuals,\nindicating that it holds a high application potential in clinical\ndiagnostics.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03129.s001
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In\nSitu, Fusion-Free, Multiplexed\nDetection of Small Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs for Cancer Diagnostics

Figshare
Extracellular vesicles in disease
article

In\nSitu, Fusion-Free, Multiplexed\nDetection of Small Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs for Cancer Diagnostics

article en

Abstract

Tumor-derived small extracellular vesicle (sEV) microRNAs\n(miRNAs)\nare emerging biomarkers for cancer diagnostics. Conventional sEV miRNA\ndetection methods necessitate the lysis of sEVs, rendering them laborious\nand time-consuming and potentially leading to damage or loss of miRNAs.\nMembrane fusion-based <i>in situ</i> detection of sEV miRNAs\ninvolves the preparation of probe-loaded vesicles (<i>e.g.</i>, liposomes or cellular vesicles), which are typically sophisticated\nand require specialist equipment. Membrane perforation methods employ\nchemical treatments that can induce severe miRNA degradation or leaks.\nInspired by previous studies that loaded nucleic acids into EVs or\ncells using hydrophobic tethers for therapeutic applications, herein,\nwe repurposed this strategy by conjugating a hydrophobic tether onto\nmolecular beacons to aid their transportation into sEVs, allowing\nfor <i>in situ</i> detection of miRNAs in a fusion-free\nand multiplexing manner. This method enables simultaneous detection\nof multiple miRNA species within serum-derived sEVs for the diagnosis\nof prostate cancer, breast cancer, and gastric cancer with an accuracy\nof 83.3%, 81.8%, and 100%, respectively, in a cohort of 66 individuals,\nindicating that it holds a high application potential in clinical\ndiagnostics.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.