Do invasive clonal plants always benefit from clonal integration? Exploring interactions between biocontrol agents and indigenous herbivores

• · The responses of two clonal plants to herbivory via clonal integration were compared. • · Clonal integration helps alligator weed handle single herbivory better. • · Alligator weed did not benefit from clonal integration under multi-herbivore attack. • · Indigenous herbivores can potentially complement biocontrol agents on clonal plants. Clonal integration can help plants counter environmental stresses, but its effects on plant responses to herbivory remain unclear. We investigated how clonal integration in the invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides and the native Alternanthera sessilis affects herbivory by the foliar insect Agasicles hygrophila and/or the root-feeding nematode Meloidogyne incognita . Plant fragments were cultivated, assigned to connected or severed treatments, and subjected to herbivory by A. hygrophila , M. incognita , both, or neither. Under clonal integration, A. philoxeroides showed significantly reduced aboveground biomass under A. hygrophila herbivory and fewer taproots and belowground biomass under M. incognita herbivory, while A. sessilis showed significantly fewer taproots and reduced aboveground biomass under M. incognita herbivory compared to no herbivory. However, A. philoxeroides exhibited significantly more ramets and fine roots, along with greater aboveground biomass under M. incognita herbivory, and greater belowground biomass under A. hygrophila herbivory, when clonal integration was maintained. Conversely, these traits in A. sessilis were either significantly lower or remained unchanged with clonal integration. Under combined herbivory by both herbivores, the stolon length, number of taproots, and aboveground and belowground biomass were significantly lower in A. philoxeroides , while these traits in A. sessilis were significantly higher with clonal integration than without. These results suggest that although clonal integration helps A. philoxeroides cope with individual herbivory by either A. hygrophila or M. incognita , it confers no benefit when two herbivores act together. Since M. incognita survives only in terrestrial environments, combining A. hygrophila and M. incognita may improve the management of terrestrial A. philoxeroides .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Control
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105855
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do invasive clonal plants always benefit from clonal integration? Exploring interactions between biocontrol agents and indigenous herbivores

1 citations
Biological Control
Nematode management and characterization studies
1.75
article

Do invasive clonal plants always benefit from clonal integration? Exploring interactions between biocontrol agents and indigenous herbivores

article en
1 citations

Abstract

• · The responses of two clonal plants to herbivory via clonal integration were compared. • · Clonal integration helps alligator weed handle single herbivory better. • · Alligator weed did not benefit from clonal integration under multi-herbivore attack. • · Indigenous herbivores can potentially complement biocontrol agents on clonal plants. Clonal integration can help plants counter environmental stresses, but its effects on plant responses to herbivory remain unclear. We investigated how clonal integration in the invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides and the native Alternanthera sessilis affects herbivory by the foliar insect Agasicles hygrophila and/or the root-feeding nematode Meloidogyne incognita . Plant fragments were cultivated, assigned to connected or severed treatments, and subjected to herbivory by A. hygrophila , M. incognita , both, or neither. Under clonal integration, A. philoxeroides showed significantly reduced aboveground biomass under A. hygrophila herbivory and fewer taproots and belowground biomass under M. incognita herbivory, while A. sessilis showed significantly fewer taproots and reduced aboveground biomass under M. incognita herbivory compared to no herbivory. However, A. philoxeroides exhibited significantly more ramets and fine roots, along with greater aboveground biomass under M. incognita herbivory, and greater belowground biomass under A. hygrophila herbivory, when clonal integration was maintained. Conversely, these traits in A. sessilis were either significantly lower or remained unchanged with clonal integration. Under combined herbivory by both herbivores, the stolon length, number of taproots, and aboveground and belowground biomass were significantly lower in A. philoxeroides , while these traits in A. sessilis were significantly higher with clonal integration than without. These results suggest that although clonal integration helps A. philoxeroides cope with individual herbivory by either A. hygrophila or M. incognita , it confers no benefit when two herbivores act together. Since M. incognita survives only in terrestrial environments, combining A. hygrophila and M. incognita may improve the management of terrestrial A. philoxeroides .

Biological ControlVol. 208
Guangxi University (CN), Guangxi Minzu University (CN), State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (CN), Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Nematode management and characterization studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.