Regulating Artificial Intelligence for CANDU Software Qualifications

This paper examines the inadequacies in qualifying Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for the Canadian nuclear energy sector. The nuclear energy sector is a high-risk environment with strict regulations to ensure safety. Despite the rising popularity of new technologies like AI, a compliance assessment would be needed against nuclear qualification procedures. First, the paper analyzes the existing regulatory framework within the Canadian nuclear sector. This analysis reveals potential gaps that traditional software qualification methods fail to address when applied to AI. The risks of AI, primarily linked to the complexity and opacity of decision-making processes, show the need for a new approach to AI regulation in nuclear. Next, a review of the Canadian regulatory framework focusing on the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) N290.14 with case studies of qualifying commercial software is presented to showcase the software qualification lifecycle. Through these detailed case studies, gaps are identified when applying the software qualifications methods to AI software. The paper presents three proposed methodologies for future AI qualification: model interpretability, feature importance, and data variety. These methodologies are investigated in order to improve the transparency, reliability, and safety of AI applications in high-risk contexts such as nuclear power plants. Finally, the paper proposes incorporating these three methodologies of evaluating AI complexity and reliability into the software qualification framework to significantly mitigate the risks and support safe deployment and operations of AI based software in the nuclear sector.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114322
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Artificial Intelligence for CANDU Software Qualifications

1 citations
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
article

Regulating Artificial Intelligence for CANDU Software Qualifications

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the inadequacies in qualifying Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for the Canadian nuclear energy sector. The nuclear energy sector is a high-risk environment with strict regulations to ensure safety. Despite the rising popularity of new technologies like AI, a compliance assessment would be needed against nuclear qualification procedures. First, the paper analyzes the existing regulatory framework within the Canadian nuclear sector. This analysis reveals potential gaps that traditional software qualification methods fail to address when applied to AI. The risks of AI, primarily linked to the complexity and opacity of decision-making processes, show the need for a new approach to AI regulation in nuclear. Next, a review of the Canadian regulatory framework focusing on the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) N290.14 with case studies of qualifying commercial software is presented to showcase the software qualification lifecycle. Through these detailed case studies, gaps are identified when applying the software qualifications methods to AI software. The paper presents three proposed methodologies for future AI qualification: model interpretability, feature importance, and data variety. These methodologies are investigated in order to improve the transparency, reliability, and safety of AI applications in high-risk contexts such as nuclear power plants. Finally, the paper proposes incorporating these three methodologies of evaluating AI complexity and reliability into the software qualification framework to significantly mitigate the risks and support safe deployment and operations of AI based software in the nuclear sector.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 443
Dalhousie University (CA), Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulating Artificial Intelligence for CANDU Software Qualifications · Nuclear Engineering and Design (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS