Coalitions, peace missions, and UNSC decision-making

This analysis examines resolutions authorising peace missions and their extensions at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) from 1948 to early 2024. Our study investigates coalitions involving the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected non-permanent members (E10). By combining quantitative voting behaviour analysis with qualitative assessments of selected resolutions and related statements, we pay particular attention to abstentions. Various coalition-formation approaches reveal insights into the dynamics of these coalitions. It becomes clear that traditional theoretical approaches must be adapted for the UNSC, as coalition formation is influenced by factors such as national interests, anticipated audience costs (including the effects on a member state’s standing within the organisation), and the desire to maintain the institution’s collective legitimacy and credibility.<br>

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-85320-3_2#citeas
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coalitions, peace missions, and UNSC decision-making

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Coalitions, peace missions, and UNSC decision-making

article en

Abstract

This analysis examines resolutions authorising peace missions and their extensions at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) from 1948 to early 2024. Our study investigates coalitions involving the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected non-permanent members (E10). By combining quantitative voting behaviour analysis with qualitative assessments of selected resolutions and related statements, we pay particular attention to abstentions. Various coalition-formation approaches reveal insights into the dynamics of these coalitions. It becomes clear that traditional theoretical approaches must be adapted for the UNSC, as coalition formation is influenced by factors such as national interests, anticipated audience costs (including the effects on a member state’s standing within the organisation), and the desire to maintain the institution’s collective legitimacy and credibility.<br>

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Leiden University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.