The Use of Chromatography in Forensic Science

Forensic science can be defined as a blending of science and the law. The study of forensics utilizes the principles and methods of the traditional sciences such as chemistry, biochemistry, and physics, but differs by the fact that conclusions are at times based on the subjective interpretation of results. This difference between the traditional sciences and forensic science is predicated in part by the judicial system. The responsibilities of the forensic scientist are unique in two respects. As a scientist, he or she must present technical results to a number of non-technically trained people such as police officers, attorneys, judges, and juries. Therefore, it is necessary for the forensic scientist as an expert witness to subjectively interpret results and communicate these conclusions as they relate to a particular case. Also, in addition to the peer review process, the results obtained by the forensic scientist must also withstand the scrutiny of challenge in court.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in chromatography
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003760115-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Chromatography in Forensic Science

Jack Hubball
2 citations
Advances in chromatography
Forensic and Genetic Research
article

The Use of Chromatography in Forensic Science

Jack Hubball
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Forensic science can be defined as a blending of science and the law. The study of forensics utilizes the principles and methods of the traditional sciences such as chemistry, biochemistry, and physics, but differs by the fact that conclusions are at times based on the subjective interpretation of results. This difference between the traditional sciences and forensic science is predicated in part by the judicial system. The responsibilities of the forensic scientist are unique in two respects. As a scientist, he or she must present technical results to a number of non-technically trained people such as police officers, attorneys, judges, and juries. Therefore, it is necessary for the forensic scientist as an expert witness to subjectively interpret results and communicate these conclusions as they relate to a particular case. Also, in addition to the peer review process, the results obtained by the forensic scientist must also withstand the scrutiny of challenge in court.

Advances in chromatographyVol. 32
Michigan State Police (US), Police Department (LT)
Gender equality
Forensic and Genetic Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Use of Chromatography in Forensic Science — Jack Hubball · Advances in chromatography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS