A Simplified Use of Quality Function Deployment as a System Tool for Designing to Cost

The problem of designing to cost is one with which industry is still grappling. A technique of requirement development, analysis, and refinement is applied to a university-class satellite development project. A simplified form of the Quality Function Deployment process was followed and allowed to structure the entire design process. It aided in evolving a mission scope which resulted in a feasible mission. This paper presents the steps developed for a senior-level, spacecraft design course. Its application to the design of a low-cost wireless power transmission experiment will be illustrated from requirements generation well into the satellite design. Cost was the prime driver in developing a feasible mission. Use of the technique allowed a cost versus benefit analysis of mission science suggested by previous studies and helped to reduce the cost by more than a factor of four over those studies. Two conditions necessary for success in designing to cost are suggested. One pertains to the organization generating the mission requirements, and the other to a paradigm shift for designers. Potential applications for university satellites and instructors developing missions for senior satellite design courses are suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26077/67xp-m261
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Simplified Use of Quality Function Deployment as a System Tool for Designing to Cost

Steven V. Deal, Victoria Coverstone-Carroll
1 citations
Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

A Simplified Use of Quality Function Deployment as a System Tool for Designing to Cost

Steven V. Deal, Victoria Coverstone-Carroll
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The problem of designing to cost is one with which industry is still grappling. A technique of requirement development, analysis, and refinement is applied to a university-class satellite development project. A simplified form of the Quality Function Deployment process was followed and allowed to structure the entire design process. It aided in evolving a mission scope which resulted in a feasible mission. This paper presents the steps developed for a senior-level, spacecraft design course. Its application to the design of a low-cost wireless power transmission experiment will be illustrated from requirements generation well into the satellite design. Cost was the prime driver in developing a feasible mission. Use of the technique allowed a cost versus benefit analysis of mission science suggested by previous studies and helped to reduce the cost by more than a factor of four over those studies. Two conditions necessary for success in designing to cost are suggested. One pertains to the organization generating the mission requirements, and the other to a paradigm shift for designers. Potential applications for university satellites and instructors developing missions for senior satellite design courses are suggested.

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)
Northrop Grumman (United States) (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Simplified Use of Quality Function Deployment as a System Tool for Designing to Cost — Steven V. Deal, Victoria Coverstone-Carroll · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS