Decoding regional dynamics: Institutions, innovation, and regional development in the EU

The importance of institutions and innovation for regional development is well established. How these two factors interact under different historical legacies and urban-regional contexts remains, however, insufficiently understood. This paper identifies which combinations of institutional and innovation indicators most effectively classify regions into distinct developmental archetypes, revealing critical thresholds that redirect regional trajectories. Employing decision-tree analysis on 233 EU NUTS-2 regions, we analyse 15 indicators spanning institutional quality, technological readiness, business sophistication, and innovation. This methodology uncovers non-linear relationships that traditional approaches cannot capture. The findings demonstrate that institutional quality acts as a necessary condition for innovation-led growth. High-performing regions, predominantly in Western and Northern Europe, benefit from robust institutions and strong innovation outputs. Many lower-performing regions, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, exhibit innovation potential but are constrained by governance deficits. By integrating institutional and innovation indicators within a single analytical framework, we underscore how addressing governance and innovation in tandem can result in balanced and sustainable growth across Europe. • Institutional quality is a prerequisite for innovation-led regional growth in the EU • Decision-tree analysis reveals non-linear thresholds in institutions–innovation dynamics • Quality of Government is the most decisive factor classifying EU regional archetypes • Innovation without effective governance fails to generate sustained growth • Lagging regions need simultaneous institutional reform and innovation investment

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Papers of the Regional Science Association
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pirs.2025.100133
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding regional dynamics: Institutions, innovation, and regional development in the EU

1 citations
Papers of the Regional Science Association
Regional Development and Policy
8.52
article

Decoding regional dynamics: Institutions, innovation, and regional development in the EU

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The importance of institutions and innovation for regional development is well established. How these two factors interact under different historical legacies and urban-regional contexts remains, however, insufficiently understood. This paper identifies which combinations of institutional and innovation indicators most effectively classify regions into distinct developmental archetypes, revealing critical thresholds that redirect regional trajectories. Employing decision-tree analysis on 233 EU NUTS-2 regions, we analyse 15 indicators spanning institutional quality, technological readiness, business sophistication, and innovation. This methodology uncovers non-linear relationships that traditional approaches cannot capture. The findings demonstrate that institutional quality acts as a necessary condition for innovation-led growth. High-performing regions, predominantly in Western and Northern Europe, benefit from robust institutions and strong innovation outputs. Many lower-performing regions, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, exhibit innovation potential but are constrained by governance deficits. By integrating institutional and innovation indicators within a single analytical framework, we underscore how addressing governance and innovation in tandem can result in balanced and sustainable growth across Europe. • Institutional quality is a prerequisite for innovation-led regional growth in the EU • Decision-tree analysis reveals non-linear thresholds in institutions–innovation dynamics • Quality of Government is the most decisive factor classifying EU regional archetypes • Innovation without effective governance fails to generate sustained growth • Lagging regions need simultaneous institutional reform and innovation investment

Papers of the Regional Science AssociationVol. 105(1)
Matej Bel University (SK), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Regional Development and Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.