Genetic types, mineralization styles, and geodynamic drive of uranium deposits in the South China Block

• U deposits show regional zonation, spatially tied to ancient crustal architecture. • U mineralization is dominantly in Cretaceous and Paleogene under extensional setting. • Ore-forming fluids are the mixing of magmatic-hydrothermal fluid and meteoric water. • Shallow tectonic-fluid system and deep magmatic activities drive U mineralization. The South China Block (SCB) is recognized as one of the most significant uranium deposit clusters in the world, characterized by its complex genetic types and geodynamic drives. Based on host rocks, uranium deposits in the SCB can be categorized into three primary types, exhibiting a trend from black shale-related deposits in the west, to granite-related, and ultimately to volcanic-related deposits toward the eastern margin of the SCB. We identify that three types of deposits are primarily distributed within or along margins of ancient crustal domains. Geochronological data reveals large-scale uranium mineralization occurred predominantly during Cretaceous and Paleogene periods. Uranium mineralization was mainly controlled by structures in the extensional setting, developed particularly at subsidiary faults, lithological (unconformity, intrusion contacts) and physicochemical interfaces. Uranium mineralization is dominantly characterized by medium to low ore-forming temperature with pitchblende as the main industrial mineral, and with silicification, carbonatization, hematitization, fluoritization and chloritization as common alteration. Isotopic studies show that sulfur sourced from host rocks, while carbon isotopes distinguish mantle-derived signatures in granite- and volcanic-related deposits from primarily sedimentary organic matter sources in black shale-related deposit. Uranium was mainly contributed by host rocks which are relatively U-fertile geological formations. Magmatic and/or mantle-derived mineralizing agents promote the activation and migration of uranium in host rocks, and accelerate the accumulation of U in ore-forming fluids. Our study suggests that the coupling of shallow and deep-seated energy and conduit system within a crustal extension setting, together with the pre-enrichment of uranium in basement and host rocks, controlled the formation of uranium deposits in the SCB.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscience Frontiers
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102241
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic types, mineralization styles, and geodynamic drive of uranium deposits in the South China Block

Geoscience Frontiers
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Genetic types, mineralization styles, and geodynamic drive of uranium deposits in the South China Block

article en

Abstract

• U deposits show regional zonation, spatially tied to ancient crustal architecture. • U mineralization is dominantly in Cretaceous and Paleogene under extensional setting. • Ore-forming fluids are the mixing of magmatic-hydrothermal fluid and meteoric water. • Shallow tectonic-fluid system and deep magmatic activities drive U mineralization. The South China Block (SCB) is recognized as one of the most significant uranium deposit clusters in the world, characterized by its complex genetic types and geodynamic drives. Based on host rocks, uranium deposits in the SCB can be categorized into three primary types, exhibiting a trend from black shale-related deposits in the west, to granite-related, and ultimately to volcanic-related deposits toward the eastern margin of the SCB. We identify that three types of deposits are primarily distributed within or along margins of ancient crustal domains. Geochronological data reveals large-scale uranium mineralization occurred predominantly during Cretaceous and Paleogene periods. Uranium mineralization was mainly controlled by structures in the extensional setting, developed particularly at subsidiary faults, lithological (unconformity, intrusion contacts) and physicochemical interfaces. Uranium mineralization is dominantly characterized by medium to low ore-forming temperature with pitchblende as the main industrial mineral, and with silicification, carbonatization, hematitization, fluoritization and chloritization as common alteration. Isotopic studies show that sulfur sourced from host rocks, while carbon isotopes distinguish mantle-derived signatures in granite- and volcanic-related deposits from primarily sedimentary organic matter sources in black shale-related deposit. Uranium was mainly contributed by host rocks which are relatively U-fertile geological formations. Magmatic and/or mantle-derived mineralizing agents promote the activation and migration of uranium in host rocks, and accelerate the accumulation of U in ore-forming fluids. Our study suggests that the coupling of shallow and deep-seated energy and conduit system within a crustal extension setting, together with the pre-enrichment of uranium in basement and host rocks, controlled the formation of uranium deposits in the SCB.

Geoscience FrontiersVol. 17(2)
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), East China University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.