Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in nonelective procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004851
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in nonelective procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in nonelective procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareVol. 100(4)
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in nonelective procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS