Two forks, one meal: Health implications of shared food systems in couples

Eating together is central to daily life in romantic couples, and food choices are often shared rather than individual. We examined the interdependence in shared food systems of romantic couples with a focus on shared meal frequency and meat consumption similarity. We investigate how shared food systems affect health and how these effects are moderated by gender and couple gender composition (different-vs. same-gender couples). This preregistered study used data from Wave 3B (autumn 2023) of the German FReDA panel (representative of 18- to 49-year-olds). Participants (N = 12,686) and their romantic partners (N = 5276) were surveyed. Measures included frequency of shared meals with the partner, meat consumption, several health outcomes, gender, and cohabitation status. Couples frequently shared meals (on average 10.23 times/week) and had similar meat consumption (r = 0.48, p < .001), particularly if they cohabited. More shared meals were associated with higher similarity and relationship satisfaction, higher life satisfaction, fewer depressive symptoms, and better subjective health, but also with higher meat consumption. No significant association with BMI was found. In heterosexual couples, gender moderated the effect on meat-shared meals associate to higher meat consumption for women but not men-but not the effects on subjective health or BMI. No gender moderations were found in homosexual couples. Findings highlight the importance of including romantic partners in models and interventions targeting eating behavior. Shared meals affect food choices (with gendered patterns) and can promote social and mental health, underlining the broad relevance of social eating.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Appetite
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108433
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two forks, one meal: Health implications of shared food systems in couples

Appetite
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Two forks, one meal: Health implications of shared food systems in couples

article en

Abstract

Eating together is central to daily life in romantic couples, and food choices are often shared rather than individual. We examined the interdependence in shared food systems of romantic couples with a focus on shared meal frequency and meat consumption similarity. We investigate how shared food systems affect health and how these effects are moderated by gender and couple gender composition (different-vs. same-gender couples). This preregistered study used data from Wave 3B (autumn 2023) of the German FReDA panel (representative of 18- to 49-year-olds). Participants (N = 12,686) and their romantic partners (N = 5276) were surveyed. Measures included frequency of shared meals with the partner, meat consumption, several health outcomes, gender, and cohabitation status. Couples frequently shared meals (on average 10.23 times/week) and had similar meat consumption (r = 0.48, p < .001), particularly if they cohabited. More shared meals were associated with higher similarity and relationship satisfaction, higher life satisfaction, fewer depressive symptoms, and better subjective health, but also with higher meat consumption. No significant association with BMI was found. In heterosexual couples, gender moderated the effect on meat-shared meals associate to higher meat consumption for women but not men-but not the effects on subjective health or BMI. No gender moderations were found in homosexual couples. Findings highlight the importance of including romantic partners in models and interventions targeting eating behavior. Shared meals affect food choices (with gendered patterns) and can promote social and mental health, underlining the broad relevance of social eating.

AppetiteVol. 220
Technische Hochschule Mannheim (DE), University of Mannheim (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.