Effectiveness of dextrose volume on outcome of ultrasound guided hydrodissection of median nerve in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) results from median nerve compression, causing pain and dysfunction. Dextrose hydrodissection shows non-surgical promise, but the optimal volume is still unclear. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-versus low-volume dextrose in ultrasound-guided hydrodissection for improving clinical outcomes in patients with mild to moderate CTS. Methods: Thirty participants with mild to moderate CTS were randomized into two groups: Group A (high-volume) received 22 mL of hydrodissection fluid (20 mL of 5% dextrose + 2 mL of 1% lidocaine), while Group B (low-volume) received 5 mL (4 mL of 5% dextrose + 1 mL of 1% lidocaine). Results: Thirty CTS participants (15 per group) had similar baseline VAS pain scores (Group A: 7.8 ± 1.2; Group B: 7.6 ± 1.3). Group A showed significantly greater pain reduction at 1 week (3.2 ± 1.5 vs. 5.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.001), with continued improvement at 1 month (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and 3 months (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes and symptom severity scores also favored Group A at 3 months (1.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). Sensory conduction velocity improved more in Group A (36.1 ± 4.0 m/s vs. 31.5 ± 3.8 m/s, p < 0.001), with both groups showing CMAP gains. Conclusion: High-volume ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection proved more effective than low-volume in treating CTS, resulting in greater pain relief, improved function, and better nerve conduction outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Azhar International Medical Journal /Al-Azhar International Medical Journal
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/aimj.2025.395038.2571
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of dextrose volume on outcome of ultrasound guided hydrodissection of median nerve in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Al-Azhar International Medical Journal /Al-Azhar International Medical Journal
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Effectiveness of dextrose volume on outcome of ultrasound guided hydrodissection of median nerve in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.

article en

Abstract

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) results from median nerve compression, causing pain and dysfunction. Dextrose hydrodissection shows non-surgical promise, but the optimal volume is still unclear. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-versus low-volume dextrose in ultrasound-guided hydrodissection for improving clinical outcomes in patients with mild to moderate CTS. Methods: Thirty participants with mild to moderate CTS were randomized into two groups: Group A (high-volume) received 22 mL of hydrodissection fluid (20 mL of 5% dextrose + 2 mL of 1% lidocaine), while Group B (low-volume) received 5 mL (4 mL of 5% dextrose + 1 mL of 1% lidocaine). Results: Thirty CTS participants (15 per group) had similar baseline VAS pain scores (Group A: 7.8 ± 1.2; Group B: 7.6 ± 1.3). Group A showed significantly greater pain reduction at 1 week (3.2 ± 1.5 vs. 5.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.001), with continued improvement at 1 month (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and 3 months (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes and symptom severity scores also favored Group A at 3 months (1.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). Sensory conduction velocity improved more in Group A (36.1 ± 4.0 m/s vs. 31.5 ± 3.8 m/s, p < 0.001), with both groups showing CMAP gains. Conclusion: High-volume ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection proved more effective than low-volume in treating CTS, resulting in greater pain relief, improved function, and better nerve conduction outcomes.

Al-Azhar International Medical Journal /Al-Azhar International Medical JournalVol. 2025(9)
Al-Azhar University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.