Governance in Social Research: Advancing Inclusive Approaches for Marginalised Communities

ABSTRACT This paper considers the role of governance within social research projects which seek to involve or deliver benefits to marginalised community groups. We argue that the increasing ‘projectification’ of research and research institutions has not translated to outcomes which meet the needs of marginalised community members. Governance of research projects, for which we propose a formal definition, should be a means of remedying this, but it is an often‐overlooked feature of research design. We assert that research projects which incorporate an inclusive governance approach are positioned to deliver enhanced outcomes for research beneficiaries from a diversity of backgrounds. To explore this topic, we first provide an overview of the concept of governance and how it is understood within the academic field of project management. Changes in the Australian research landscape and the shift towards projectification are then discussed. Following this, the role of governance in effective project management, and where governance sits in relation to research ethics and co‐design approaches, is explored. Two examples of inclusive research governance in Australia are then reviewed. To conclude, we propose a values framework that could be utilised in the establishment of an effective governance approach.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70090
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance in Social Research: Advancing Inclusive Approaches for Marginalised Communities

Australian Journal of Social Issues
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Governance in Social Research: Advancing Inclusive Approaches for Marginalised Communities

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper considers the role of governance within social research projects which seek to involve or deliver benefits to marginalised community groups. We argue that the increasing ‘projectification’ of research and research institutions has not translated to outcomes which meet the needs of marginalised community members. Governance of research projects, for which we propose a formal definition, should be a means of remedying this, but it is an often‐overlooked feature of research design. We assert that research projects which incorporate an inclusive governance approach are positioned to deliver enhanced outcomes for research beneficiaries from a diversity of backgrounds. To explore this topic, we first provide an overview of the concept of governance and how it is understood within the academic field of project management. Changes in the Australian research landscape and the shift towards projectification are then discussed. Following this, the role of governance in effective project management, and where governance sits in relation to research ethics and co‐design approaches, is explored. Two examples of inclusive research governance in Australia are then reviewed. To conclude, we propose a values framework that could be utilised in the establishment of an effective governance approach.

Australian Journal of Social Issues
Curtin University (AU)
Curtin University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.