Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises

The marine world is an acoustic world that has become noisier with the increasing diversity and intensity of human activities at sea. The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is one of the best-studied cetaceans regarding hearing and responses to human-made underwater sound. The species is most sensitive to high frequencies, yet most impact studies have focused on relatively low-frequency sources. As such, the effects of high-frequency sonar - including echosounders - remain largely unstudied, despite their widespread use on vessels for depth sounding, fish or object detection, and seabed mapping. We investigated the effects of scientific echosounder use on harbour porpoises in the southern part of the North Sea using 13 deployments of multi-sensor moorings equipped with an echosounder, acoustic cetacean logger, and a hydrophone. Moorings operated for an average of 57 days, with split-beam scientific echosounders active for an average of 51 days, transmitting for 10 min every hour (5 min at 70 kHz, followed by 5 min at either 185-255 kHz or again at 70 kHz). Porpoise acoustic presence was continuously monitored using C/F-PODs and additionally validated with hydrophone detections at four of the locations. Across all 13 sites, detections declined by 65-79 % during echosounder transmissions and returned to typical levels within ∼30 min after the echosounder stopped pinging. Despite this relatively quick recovery, there was no indication of habituation, as responses did not diminish across observation periods over six weeks of hourly exposure. Spatial effects appeared local, as no deterrent effect was observed at 2.5 km from the source. These findings have important implications for studies that investigate both harbour porpoise and fish presence to understand predator-prey interactions. In addition, they raise concern about the potentially cumulative impact on sensitive cetaceans from the wide use of relatively high-frequency sonar in offshore practices.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Pollution
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127569
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises

Environmental Pollution
Marine animal studies overview
article

Echosounders for fish detection disturb harbour porpoises

article en

Abstract

The marine world is an acoustic world that has become noisier with the increasing diversity and intensity of human activities at sea. The harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) is one of the best-studied cetaceans regarding hearing and responses to human-made underwater sound. The species is most sensitive to high frequencies, yet most impact studies have focused on relatively low-frequency sources. As such, the effects of high-frequency sonar - including echosounders - remain largely unstudied, despite their widespread use on vessels for depth sounding, fish or object detection, and seabed mapping. We investigated the effects of scientific echosounder use on harbour porpoises in the southern part of the North Sea using 13 deployments of multi-sensor moorings equipped with an echosounder, acoustic cetacean logger, and a hydrophone. Moorings operated for an average of 57 days, with split-beam scientific echosounders active for an average of 51 days, transmitting for 10 min every hour (5 min at 70 kHz, followed by 5 min at either 185-255 kHz or again at 70 kHz). Porpoise acoustic presence was continuously monitored using C/F-PODs and additionally validated with hydrophone detections at four of the locations. Across all 13 sites, detections declined by 65-79 % during echosounder transmissions and returned to typical levels within ∼30 min after the echosounder stopped pinging. Despite this relatively quick recovery, there was no indication of habituation, as responses did not diminish across observation periods over six weeks of hourly exposure. Spatial effects appeared local, as no deterrent effect was observed at 2.5 km from the source. These findings have important implications for studies that investigate both harbour porpoise and fish presence to understand predator-prey interactions. In addition, they raise concern about the potentially cumulative impact on sensitive cetaceans from the wide use of relatively high-frequency sonar in offshore practices.

Environmental PollutionVol. 391
Leiden University (NL), Flanders Marine Institute (BE), Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Reuter Foundation, Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, LifeWatch – Niclas Öberg Foundation, Vlaamse regering, Rijkswaterstaat
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.