Search for novel biomarkers of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients: an overview

A single-center prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kuopio Finland over the past two decades, searching for novel biomarker candidates to predict complicated course of febrile neutropenia (FN) in hematological patients. In Dec 2006‒Dec 2015, 85 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and 179 autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients were included. More than 20 biomarkers were evaluated in subsequent patient cohorts and compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). The samples were taken on d0-d2 from the beginning of FN. Here, we provide an overview of the results of these studies. Most biomarkers evaluated did not provide additional prognostic benefit compared to CRP or PCT. The most promising biomarkers warranting further studies include soluble cluster of differentiation 14, interleukin-1-receptor antagonist, interleukin-10, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18. Several biomarkers evaluated in this series of studies are hampered by impaired production by neutrophils/leukocytes (matrix metalloproteinase-8, cell-free plasma DNA and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) or platelets (vascular endothelial growth factor). For now, these novel biomarkers cannot substitute the conventional markers nor provide additional benefit in routine use. Optimally, the most promising novel markers should be evaluated in prospective multicenter studies with higher patient numbers and several endpoints to more reliably evaluate their performance. At present, close patient monitoring is imperative in hematological patients with FN. The additional information provided by novel FN biomarkers may be useful, but they should be evaluated combined with daily evaluation of sepsis scoring systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01995-3
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Search for novel biomarkers of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients: an overview

Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Search for novel biomarkers of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients: an overview

article en

Abstract

A single-center prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Kuopio Finland over the past two decades, searching for novel biomarker candidates to predict complicated course of febrile neutropenia (FN) in hematological patients. In Dec 2006‒Dec 2015, 85 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and 179 autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients were included. More than 20 biomarkers were evaluated in subsequent patient cohorts and compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). The samples were taken on d0-d2 from the beginning of FN. Here, we provide an overview of the results of these studies. Most biomarkers evaluated did not provide additional prognostic benefit compared to CRP or PCT. The most promising biomarkers warranting further studies include soluble cluster of differentiation 14, interleukin-1-receptor antagonist, interleukin-10, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18. Several biomarkers evaluated in this series of studies are hampered by impaired production by neutrophils/leukocytes (matrix metalloproteinase-8, cell-free plasma DNA and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) or platelets (vascular endothelial growth factor). For now, these novel biomarkers cannot substitute the conventional markers nor provide additional benefit in routine use. Optimally, the most promising novel markers should be evaluated in prospective multicenter studies with higher patient numbers and several endpoints to more reliably evaluate their performance. At present, close patient monitoring is imperative in hematological patients with FN. The additional information provided by novel FN biomarkers may be useful, but they should be evaluated combined with daily evaluation of sepsis scoring systems.

Clinical and Experimental MedicineVol. 26(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.