Judicial supervision for the implementation of criminal judgments

The execution of criminal judgments must be carried out in accordance with the provisions approved by the law in accordance with the rules regulating it, and in a manner that does not contradict the rights of the convicts, taking into account the means that allow him to remove anything that contradicts that, and resorting to the judiciary to adjudicate on all the shortcomings that occur during the period of punitive execution. Implementation in a manner that achieves the goal of punishment in accordance with the modern concept of the penal policy represented in the rehabilitation, rehabilitation and reintegration of the convict into society, and ensuring the proper implementation of the punishment by addressing all components and elements of the intellectual, psychological and health structure of the personality of the convict, using various methods of punitive treatment aimed at achieving the desired reform purpose of the punishment, all within the framework of A constitutional guarantee and a clear codification that emphasizes the legal and judicial protections for everything related to the rights and freedoms of the convict during execution, which requires the state to direct all its energies towards performing its positive role in reform, so that the punitive implementation phase does not become a picture of an unjust punitive authority aimed at infringing on human rights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUIQ Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70176/3106-7557.1006
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial supervision for the implementation of criminal judgments

Ammar Hameed Jallab Al-Attabi
AUIQ Humanities and Social Sciences
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
article

Judicial supervision for the implementation of criminal judgments

Ammar Hameed Jallab Al-Attabi
article en

Abstract

The execution of criminal judgments must be carried out in accordance with the provisions approved by the law in accordance with the rules regulating it, and in a manner that does not contradict the rights of the convicts, taking into account the means that allow him to remove anything that contradicts that, and resorting to the judiciary to adjudicate on all the shortcomings that occur during the period of punitive execution. Implementation in a manner that achieves the goal of punishment in accordance with the modern concept of the penal policy represented in the rehabilitation, rehabilitation and reintegration of the convict into society, and ensuring the proper implementation of the punishment by addressing all components and elements of the intellectual, psychological and health structure of the personality of the convict, using various methods of punitive treatment aimed at achieving the desired reform purpose of the punishment, all within the framework of A constitutional guarantee and a clear codification that emphasizes the legal and judicial protections for everything related to the rights and freedoms of the convict during execution, which requires the state to direct all its energies towards performing its positive role in reform, so that the punitive implementation phase does not become a picture of an unjust punitive authority aimed at infringing on human rights.

AUIQ Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.