Facial expression recognition in the broader autism phenotype: What does alexithymia have to do with it?

Emotion recognition difficulties are widely reported in autism, but the "alexithymia hypothesis" proposes that such deficits are driven by co-occurring alexithymic traits rather than autism itself. We tested this hypothesis in a large sample of 556 adults spanning the broader autism phenotype, using self-reported autistic traits (Autism Quotient, AQ), alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale, TAS-20), and multiple face processing tasks. All participants completed an emotional expression discrimination task; Subsample 1 (N = 231) additionally completed an expression labelling task and Raven's matrices, while Subsample 2 (N = 325) completed the Cambridge Face Memory Test. Across correlational, regression, partial correlation, and mediation analyses, autistic traits-particularly social-communicative difficulties-were the strongest and most consistent predictors of poorer emotion recognition. In contrast, the core alexithymia facets of difficulty identifying and describing feelings did not contribute unique variance once autistic traits were controlled. Importantly, externally oriented thinking (EOT) emerged as the only alexithymia facet with independent predictive value, consistently associated with reduced accuracy across both emotional and identity face recognition tasks. This suggests that EOT reflects a broader domain-general attentional style that deprioritises reflective engagement with socially salient information. Group-based analyses further confirmed that high autistic trait groups showed significant recognition impairments regardless of alexithymia levels. These findings challenge the alexithymia hypothesis and highlight autistic traits as primary drivers of emotion recognition difficulties, with EOT adding an additional, qualitatively distinct influence. The results call for revised multivariate models of face and emotion processing that integrate autistic traits, attentional orientations, cognitive ability, and gender.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106407
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial expression recognition in the broader autism phenotype: What does alexithymia have to do with it?

Ellen M. Castle, Jeremy J. Tree, C. R. Kannan, John Towler et al.
Cognition
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Facial expression recognition in the broader autism phenotype: What does alexithymia have to do with it?

Ellen M. Castle, Jeremy J. Tree, C. R. Kannan, John Towler, David J. Brooks, Michael Jeanne Childs, C. Soupioni, H. Fletcher-Miles, S. Donnelley, T. Reinert-Joensen
article en

Abstract

Emotion recognition difficulties are widely reported in autism, but the "alexithymia hypothesis" proposes that such deficits are driven by co-occurring alexithymic traits rather than autism itself. We tested this hypothesis in a large sample of 556 adults spanning the broader autism phenotype, using self-reported autistic traits (Autism Quotient, AQ), alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale, TAS-20), and multiple face processing tasks. All participants completed an emotional expression discrimination task; Subsample 1 (N = 231) additionally completed an expression labelling task and Raven's matrices, while Subsample 2 (N = 325) completed the Cambridge Face Memory Test. Across correlational, regression, partial correlation, and mediation analyses, autistic traits-particularly social-communicative difficulties-were the strongest and most consistent predictors of poorer emotion recognition. In contrast, the core alexithymia facets of difficulty identifying and describing feelings did not contribute unique variance once autistic traits were controlled. Importantly, externally oriented thinking (EOT) emerged as the only alexithymia facet with independent predictive value, consistently associated with reduced accuracy across both emotional and identity face recognition tasks. This suggests that EOT reflects a broader domain-general attentional style that deprioritises reflective engagement with socially salient information. Group-based analyses further confirmed that high autistic trait groups showed significant recognition impairments regardless of alexithymia levels. These findings challenge the alexithymia hypothesis and highlight autistic traits as primary drivers of emotion recognition difficulties, with EOT adding an additional, qualitatively distinct influence. The results call for revised multivariate models of face and emotion processing that integrate autistic traits, attentional orientations, cognitive ability, and gender.

CognitionVol. 270
Swansea University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.