Black Women and Latinas in STEM: A Systematic Review of Literature

This systematic review of literature examines scholarly studies conducted on Black women and Latinas in STEM fields and in STEM higher education. Women are underrepresented in STEM, and on average they comprise 27% of the STEM population (National Science Foundation, 2017). Black women and Latinas are even further underrepresented in STEM by making up only 14.58 % and 3% of the employees in STEM industries (Hispanic Heritage Foundation, 2020; National Science Foundation, 2021). Barriers for all women are the focus of much of the body of literature in STEM (Beach et al., 2024; Moore, 2024). Isolating specific challenges Black women and Latinas face in academia and the workforce is critical to the attraction, retention, and promotion of these two cohorts (NASEM, 2022, Ong et at., 2011). Being at the intersection of race and gender (Crenshaw, 1989), many of the injustices Black women and Latinas face are much worse relative to their White counterparts (Borum & Walker, 2012; Valenzuela, 2020; Wilkins-Yel, 2022; Yosso et al., 2009). It is the goal of this systematic review to shed light on the nature of literature that focuses on Black women and Latinas in STEM. Compounding the issue is that Black women and Latinas are also underrepresented in STEM academia where research typically takes place (Kachchaf et al., 2015; Krebsbach, 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Moore, 2024). There are fewer role models for female students, and this scarcity is particularly pronounced for these two groups of women. It is the goal of this study to highlight what researchers have discovered regarding these two populations. This systematic review will analyze 30 studies, 15 focused on Black women and 15 concentrate on Latinas. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for each are stated in the methodology section. The studies under review can be qualitative or quantitative and need to be conducted in the past decade, 2015-2025.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Scholarship Without Borders Journal
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57229/2834-2267.1073
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black Women and Latinas in STEM: A Systematic Review of Literature

Kieran Moore
The Scholarship Without Borders Journal
Career Development and Diversity
article

Black Women and Latinas in STEM: A Systematic Review of Literature

Kieran Moore
article en

Abstract

This systematic review of literature examines scholarly studies conducted on Black women and Latinas in STEM fields and in STEM higher education. Women are underrepresented in STEM, and on average they comprise 27% of the STEM population (National Science Foundation, 2017). Black women and Latinas are even further underrepresented in STEM by making up only 14.58 % and 3% of the employees in STEM industries (Hispanic Heritage Foundation, 2020; National Science Foundation, 2021). Barriers for all women are the focus of much of the body of literature in STEM (Beach et al., 2024; Moore, 2024). Isolating specific challenges Black women and Latinas face in academia and the workforce is critical to the attraction, retention, and promotion of these two cohorts (NASEM, 2022, Ong et at., 2011). Being at the intersection of race and gender (Crenshaw, 1989), many of the injustices Black women and Latinas face are much worse relative to their White counterparts (Borum & Walker, 2012; Valenzuela, 2020; Wilkins-Yel, 2022; Yosso et al., 2009). It is the goal of this systematic review to shed light on the nature of literature that focuses on Black women and Latinas in STEM. Compounding the issue is that Black women and Latinas are also underrepresented in STEM academia where research typically takes place (Kachchaf et al., 2015; Krebsbach, 2022; Lee et al., 2023; Moore, 2024). There are fewer role models for female students, and this scarcity is particularly pronounced for these two groups of women. It is the goal of this study to highlight what researchers have discovered regarding these two populations. This systematic review will analyze 30 studies, 15 focused on Black women and 15 concentrate on Latinas. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for each are stated in the methodology section. The studies under review can be qualitative or quantitative and need to be conducted in the past decade, 2015-2025.

The Scholarship Without Borders JournalVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.