National Analysis of Adverse Events Involving Distal Radius Plate Systems Reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration

Hardware breakage and pain were the most frequently reported device and patient events, respectively. The distribution of reported problem-code categories varied across manufacturers, locking mechanisms, and plate subtypes. However, the observed findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating, as MAUDE lacks exposure denominators and key clinical context, and therefore should not be interpreted as evidence of causal, comparative safety, or performance, or as recommendations for or against any specific manufacturer. Future studies with exposure data are warranted to validate these signals and evaluate comparative risks. Despite the inherent limitations of the MAUDE database, these findings present invaluable information on the reported adverse events of DRP systems and may inform proactive postoperative surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.99721
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Analysis of Adverse Events Involving Distal Radius Plate Systems Reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration

Andres S Espinoza, Leonardo Cavinatto, A.N. Jensen, Zahoor Ahmad et al.
Cureus
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

National Analysis of Adverse Events Involving Distal Radius Plate Systems Reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration

Andres S Espinoza, Leonardo Cavinatto, A.N. Jensen, Zahoor Ahmad, Maya Nassif, Isabella Strickler
article en

Abstract

Hardware breakage and pain were the most frequently reported device and patient events, respectively. The distribution of reported problem-code categories varied across manufacturers, locking mechanisms, and plate subtypes. However, the observed findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating, as MAUDE lacks exposure denominators and key clinical context, and therefore should not be interpreted as evidence of causal, comparative safety, or performance, or as recommendations for or against any specific manufacturer. Future studies with exposure data are warranted to validate these signals and evaluate comparative risks. Despite the inherent limitations of the MAUDE database, these findings present invaluable information on the reported adverse events of DRP systems and may inform proactive postoperative surveillance.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Oakland University (US), Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Beaumont Hospital, Troy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.