Gaps in tropical science from unrepresentative distribution of sampling and citation across natural terrestrial environments

Effective environmental policies for the tropics depend on accurate, representative scientific data. However, there is strong evidence from particular disciplines and regions that existing research is patchily distributed. Here, we show that poor representation of sampling and citation in some biomes and across key environmental gradients from all disciplines for the entire tropics may lead to flawed scientific paradigms and inappropriate policy prescriptions. We map sampling locations and citations from 2 738 published studies in natural terrestrial tropical environments across all disciplines to identify gaps in field sampling effort and research attention. Five ecoregions - all in moist broadleaf forests - generate 22% of the total citations but cover only 3% of the tropical land area. By contrast, drier biomes with low tree cover account collectively for 57% of the tropical area but generate only 20% of total citations. Locations that are drier, colder, with greater plant species richness, lower tree cover and facing greater climate change extremes are under-sampled and under-cited. Our results will help to correct these imbalances to improve the scientific basis for environmental policies across the tropics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67617-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps in tropical science from unrepresentative distribution of sampling and citation across natural terrestrial environments

Mirindi Eric Dusenge, Kenneth J. Feeley, Micael Jonsson, Paul Kardol et al.
1 citations
Nature Communications
Species Distribution and Climate Change
1.84
article

Gaps in tropical science from unrepresentative distribution of sampling and citation across natural terrestrial environments

Mirindi Eric Dusenge, Kenneth J. Feeley, Micael Jonsson, Paul Kardol, Jing Tang, Thomas Cherico Wanger, Nitin Chaudhary, Maria Wittemann, E. Petter Axelsson, Aida Bargués Tobella, Daniel B. Metcalfe, Myriam Mujawamariya, Norma Salinas, Janet S. Prevéy, David C. Bartholomew, Shubhangi Lamba, Arvid Lindh, Nathalie Butt, Thirze Hermans, Anna‐Maria Virkkala, Cecilia A. L. Dahlsjö, Bernice C. Hwang, Göran Wallin, Daniel Lussetti, Olivier Jean Leonce Manzi, Hinsby Cadillo‐Quiroz, Timon Callebaut, Wenxin Zhang, Olivia K. Vought, April E. Bermudez, Yan Yan, Emily Anders, Gavyn Mewett, Hanna Axén
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Effective environmental policies for the tropics depend on accurate, representative scientific data. However, there is strong evidence from particular disciplines and regions that existing research is patchily distributed. Here, we show that poor representation of sampling and citation in some biomes and across key environmental gradients from all disciplines for the entire tropics may lead to flawed scientific paradigms and inappropriate policy prescriptions. We map sampling locations and citations from 2 738 published studies in natural terrestrial tropical environments across all disciplines to identify gaps in field sampling effort and research attention. Five ecoregions - all in moist broadleaf forests - generate 22% of the total citations but cover only 3% of the tropical land area. By contrast, drier biomes with low tree cover account collectively for 57% of the tropical area but generate only 20% of total citations. Locations that are drier, colder, with greater plant species richness, lower tree cover and facing greater climate change extremes are under-sampled and under-cited. Our results will help to correct these imbalances to improve the scientific basis for environmental policies across the tropics.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Australian National University (AU), University of Copenhagen (DK), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AU), University of Leeds (GB), Woodwell Climate Research Center (US), University of Helsinki (FI), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), University of Miami (US), Botanic Gardens Conservation International (GB), Universitat de Lleida (ES), University of New Hampshire (US), Stockholm University (SE), The University of Queensland (AU), University of New Mexico (US), Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US), Lund University (SE), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Exeter (GB), University of Michigan (US), Leverhulme Trust (GB), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Westlake University (CN), University of Oxford (GB), University of Rwanda (RW), Institute of Nature Management (BY), Rwanda Development Board (RW), Umeå Plant Science Centre (SE), Agroscope (CH), Science Oxford (GB), Beijing Haidian Hospital (CN), China Agricultural University (CN), Arizona State University (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE), Zhejiang University (CN), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Gothenburg (SE), Umeå University (SE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
National Science Foundation, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.