“Homo ex Machina”: A historico-philosophical analysis of the machine–organism analogy

From the early modern period onward, philosophers, naturalists, and physicians have speculated on the extent to which the organic body might be understood by analogy with machines such as automata, clocks, and other mechanical artifacts. This paper examines the assumptions underlying these comparisons, tracing the material and conceptual conditions that have shaped the perceived relations between organisms and artifacts. I argue that these comparisons must be situated within two dominant conceptions of the machine: an anthropocentric and a non-anthropocentric one. By reconstructing their historical emergence, I suggest that this distinction is crucial for understanding how continuities and differences between organisms and machines have been, and continue to be, conceptualized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œreasoner
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/1757-0522/30066
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Homo ex Machina”: A historico-philosophical analysis of the machine–organism analogy

Maurizio Esposito
˜The œreasoner
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

“Homo ex Machina”: A historico-philosophical analysis of the machine–organism analogy

Maurizio Esposito
article en

Abstract

From the early modern period onward, philosophers, naturalists, and physicians have speculated on the extent to which the organic body might be understood by analogy with machines such as automata, clocks, and other mechanical artifacts. This paper examines the assumptions underlying these comparisons, tracing the material and conceptual conditions that have shaped the perceived relations between organisms and artifacts. I argue that these comparisons must be situated within two dominant conceptions of the machine: an anthropocentric and a non-anthropocentric one. By reconstructing their historical emergence, I suggest that this distinction is crucial for understanding how continuities and differences between organisms and machines have been, and continue to be, conceptualized.

˜The œreasonerVol. 19(4)
University of Milan (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.