Deconstructing Judicial Legitimacy: The “Test of Independence” as a Contested Remedy for Poland’s Politicized Judiciary

This article examines the mechanisms for testing judicial independence introduced in Poland following the 2017 reforms of the National Council of the Judiciary. Through an analysis of Supreme Court case law from 2020-2024, the study reveals fundamental paradoxes in applying both the juridical test (Supreme Court resolution of 2020) and the statutory test (2022 Act). The research demonstrates that these mechanisms, rather than restoring legitimacy to the judiciary, have deepened systemic fragmentation through selective application, auto-immunization of questioned judges, and procedural asymmetries between court chambers. The article argues that the test of independence constitutes a symptom of constitutional crisis rather than its remedy, reflecting the impossibility of system self-repair when key oversight institutions have been captured. The Polish case offers broader lessons about the fragility of judicial independence and limitations of formal mechanisms in addressing democratic backsliding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS)
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/2612-6672/30379
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstructing Judicial Legitimacy: The “Test of Independence” as a Contested Remedy for Poland’s Politicized Judiciary

Andrzej Jackiewicz
Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS)
Law in Society and Culture
article

Deconstructing Judicial Legitimacy: The “Test of Independence” as a Contested Remedy for Poland’s Politicized Judiciary

Andrzej Jackiewicz
article en

Abstract

This article examines the mechanisms for testing judicial independence introduced in Poland following the 2017 reforms of the National Council of the Judiciary. Through an analysis of Supreme Court case law from 2020-2024, the study reveals fundamental paradoxes in applying both the juridical test (Supreme Court resolution of 2020) and the statutory test (2022 Act). The research demonstrates that these mechanisms, rather than restoring legitimacy to the judiciary, have deepened systemic fragmentation through selective application, auto-immunization of questioned judges, and procedural asymmetries between court chambers. The article argues that the test of independence constitutes a symptom of constitutional crisis rather than its remedy, reflecting the impossibility of system self-repair when key oversight institutions have been captured. The Polish case offers broader lessons about the fragility of judicial independence and limitations of formal mechanisms in addressing democratic backsliding.

Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS)Vol. 7(2)
University of Białystok (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deconstructing Judicial Legitimacy: The “Test of Independence” as a Contested Remedy for Poland’s Politicized Judiciary — Andrzej Jackiewicz · Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie Diritto Istituzioni Società (NAD-DIS) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS