Addressing the Determinants of Ambiguous Assignments Incurred by the Mass Spectrometry Sequence Analysis of Large Modified RNAs

Common mass spectrometric approaches for the characterization of large RNAs involve cleaving the initial strand into smaller sections amenable to mass mapping and gas-phase sequencing. These approaches are plagued by the significant loss of information associated with the production of ambiguous isomeric/isobaric products by the classic nucleotide-specific endonucleases. In this report, we investigated the intrinsic determinants of such ambiguities and evaluated the ability of alternative experimental strategies to minimize their impact. Simulating the RNase T1 digestion of test analytes spanning up to 1869 nt showed that the number and spacing of susceptible sites determined the possible isomeric/isobaric status, but product size was the most important factor. The outcome of limited digestion and time-course analyses showed that promoting missed cleavages could effectively increase the average size of digestion products without exceeding the range accessible by gas-phase sequencing, which translated into significant reductions of ambiguous assignments. Indeed, these approaches yielded mass mapping and sequencing coverages in the 92-98% and 76-92% ranges for the test analytes. The study demonstrated that while the intrinsic determinants of mass degeneracy cannot be eliminated, their impact can be effectively managed through careful experimental design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c05115
Primary Topic
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Determinants of Ambiguous Assignments Incurred by the Mass Spectrometry Sequence Analysis of Large Modified RNAs

Thomas Kenderdine, Ghazaleh Yassaghi, Daniele Rollo, Daniele Fabris et al.
Analytical Chemistry
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
article

Addressing the Determinants of Ambiguous Assignments Incurred by the Mass Spectrometry Sequence Analysis of Large Modified RNAs

Thomas Kenderdine, Ghazaleh Yassaghi, Daniele Rollo, Daniele Fabris, C. Austen Angell
article en

Abstract

Common mass spectrometric approaches for the characterization of large RNAs involve cleaving the initial strand into smaller sections amenable to mass mapping and gas-phase sequencing. These approaches are plagued by the significant loss of information associated with the production of ambiguous isomeric/isobaric products by the classic nucleotide-specific endonucleases. In this report, we investigated the intrinsic determinants of such ambiguities and evaluated the ability of alternative experimental strategies to minimize their impact. Simulating the RNase T1 digestion of test analytes spanning up to 1869 nt showed that the number and spacing of susceptible sites determined the possible isomeric/isobaric status, but product size was the most important factor. The outcome of limited digestion and time-course analyses showed that promoting missed cleavages could effectively increase the average size of digestion products without exceeding the range accessible by gas-phase sequencing, which translated into significant reductions of ambiguous assignments. Indeed, these approaches yielded mass mapping and sequencing coverages in the 92-98% and 76-92% ranges for the test analytes. The study demonstrated that while the intrinsic determinants of mass degeneracy cannot be eliminated, their impact can be effectively managed through careful experimental design.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 98(1)
University of Connecticut (US), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology (CZ), Dynamic Research (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.