A systematic review and meta-analysis to identify behavioural content and active ingredients of antimicrobial stewardship education and training interventions in hospital-based care settings
Our results suggest that AMS education and training interventions may be more effective when they focus on modelling and appropriate restriction, and when delivered in-person. However, more evidence is needed from well-designed studies that explicitly report intervention content, to enable firmer conclusions about the specific elements involved in effective AMS education and training.
Authors
- Nick Meader (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-6605)
- Laura Shallcross (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-2555)
- Lucie Byrne‐Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9658-5394)
- Jo Hart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9985-5137)
- Fabiana Lorencatto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4418-7957)
- Rebecca Turner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-4626)
- Hosein Shabaninejad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-1398)
- Stephen J. C. Rice (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-0813)
- Nia Coupe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4974-5794)
- Nawaraj Bhattarai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1894-2499)
- Sophie Griffiths (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0638-8168)
- King-Fai Cheng
Institutions
- University of Staffordshire (GB)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
- Published
- 2025-12-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01660-0
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00