Finite-element Gaussian processes for the machine learning of steady-state linear partial differential equations

We introduce finite-element Gaussian processes (FEGPs), a novel physics-informed machine learning approach for solving inverse problems involving steady-state, linear partial differential equations (PDEs). Our framework combines a Gaussian process prior for the unknown solution function with a likelihood that incorporates the PDE in its weak form, using a finite-element approximation. This approach offers significantly better scalability than physics-informed Gaussian processes (PIGPs), which rely on the strong form of the PDE. Through numerical experiments on a range of synthetic benchmark problems, we show that FEGPs offer results which outperform PIGPs, and are competitive with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) with improved uncertainty quantification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.118580
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite-element Gaussian processes for the machine learning of steady-state linear partial differential equations

Hao Gao, Dirk Husmeier, David R. Dalton
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Finite-element Gaussian processes for the machine learning of steady-state linear partial differential equations

Hao Gao, Dirk Husmeier, David R. Dalton
article en

Abstract

We introduce finite-element Gaussian processes (FEGPs), a novel physics-informed machine learning approach for solving inverse problems involving steady-state, linear partial differential equations (PDEs). Our framework combines a Gaussian process prior for the unknown solution function with a likelihood that incorporates the PDE in its weak form, using a finite-element approximation. This approach offers significantly better scalability than physics-informed Gaussian processes (PIGPs), which rely on the strong form of the PDE. Through numerical experiments on a range of synthetic benchmark problems, we show that FEGPs offer results which outperform PIGPs, and are competitive with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) with improved uncertainty quantification.

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringVol. 451
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.