Ibn Hajar's Annotations in His Work "Al-Nukat on Ibn Al-Salah": A Case Study on the Hasan Hadith

This study examines the concept of annotations and the related terminologies, with a focus on the importance of studying such annotations in the field of Hadith. The research highlights the contributions of the two eminent scholars, Ibn Al-Salah and Ibn Hajar, as well as the significance of their respective works. Particular attention is given to Ibn Hajar's critical annotations on Ibn Al-Salah's classification of "Hasan Hadith" (Good Hadith). The study adopts an inductive methodology, collecting and analyzing Ibn Hajar's critiques of other scholars. Key findings include the differences in terminological connotations between early and later scholars, as well as the observation that the strength of a text increases when multiple chains of transmission originate from distinct sources. Additionally, some of Ibn Hajar's annotations serve as expansions or clarifications of Ibn Al-Salah's original discourse.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UB Journal for Humanities
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65073/1658-9343.1125
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ibn Hajar's Annotations in His Work "Al-Nukat on Ibn Al-Salah": A Case Study on the Hasan Hadith

Nadia Abdulrahman Abdullah Alasbali
UB Journal for Humanities
Islamic Studies and History
article

Ibn Hajar's Annotations in His Work "Al-Nukat on Ibn Al-Salah": A Case Study on the Hasan Hadith

Nadia Abdulrahman Abdullah Alasbali
article en

Abstract

This study examines the concept of annotations and the related terminologies, with a focus on the importance of studying such annotations in the field of Hadith. The research highlights the contributions of the two eminent scholars, Ibn Al-Salah and Ibn Hajar, as well as the significance of their respective works. Particular attention is given to Ibn Hajar's critical annotations on Ibn Al-Salah's classification of "Hasan Hadith" (Good Hadith). The study adopts an inductive methodology, collecting and analyzing Ibn Hajar's critiques of other scholars. Key findings include the differences in terminological connotations between early and later scholars, as well as the observation that the strength of a text increases when multiple chains of transmission originate from distinct sources. Additionally, some of Ibn Hajar's annotations serve as expansions or clarifications of Ibn Al-Salah's original discourse.

UB Journal for HumanitiesVol. 3(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.