Experimental Analysis of Unsteady Drag Forces During Pool Boiling

Abstract Understanding two-phase flow is key to the safety and efficiency analyses of light water nuclear reactors (LWRs). The bubble departure diameter highly influences the prediction of the heat flux of the system. By using high-speed photography, this work seeks to conduct a quantitative examination of individual forces contained in a force-balance approach for bubble departure diameter prediction. A comparison of different models to estimate the growth force can provide further insight into the force-balance approach. Computation of an experimental growth force had an average magnitude of ≈10−6 N. However, when using the Rayleigh–Plesset and added mass models with the radius functions used by Klausner et al. (1993) and Sugrue and Buongiorno (2016), the average magnitude for the growth force was higher at ≈10−3 N, while at the same time the profile shape of these modeled growth forces differed from that of the experimental growth force. In comparison, when using the growth force models with the experimental radius, the profiles of these forces were similar to the experimental growth force profile shape, but the average magnitudes were ≈10−4 N and ≈10−5 N, respectively. It was found that when the radius takes the form of a square root minus a linear function, the profile of the growth force using the models is closer to the experimental force profile. The analysis performed in this work can contribute to a better bubble departure diameter prediction, further enhancing pool boiling analyses with applications in LWR operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070717
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Analysis of Unsteady Drag Forces During Pool Boiling

Silvina Cancelos, Juan Francisco Sánchez Pérez
Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Experimental Analysis of Unsteady Drag Forces During Pool Boiling

Silvina Cancelos, Juan Francisco Sánchez Pérez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding two-phase flow is key to the safety and efficiency analyses of light water nuclear reactors (LWRs). The bubble departure diameter highly influences the prediction of the heat flux of the system. By using high-speed photography, this work seeks to conduct a quantitative examination of individual forces contained in a force-balance approach for bubble departure diameter prediction. A comparison of different models to estimate the growth force can provide further insight into the force-balance approach. Computation of an experimental growth force had an average magnitude of ≈10−6 N. However, when using the Rayleigh–Plesset and added mass models with the radius functions used by Klausner et al. (1993) and Sugrue and Buongiorno (2016), the average magnitude for the growth force was higher at ≈10−3 N, while at the same time the profile shape of these modeled growth forces differed from that of the experimental growth force. In comparison, when using the growth force models with the experimental radius, the profiles of these forces were similar to the experimental growth force profile shape, but the average magnitudes were ≈10−4 N and ≈10−5 N, respectively. It was found that when the radius takes the form of a square root minus a linear function, the profile of the growth force using the models is closer to the experimental force profile. The analysis performed in this work can contribute to a better bubble departure diameter prediction, further enhancing pool boiling analyses with applications in LWR operation.

Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation ScienceVol. 12(1)
University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez (PR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.