Advancing real-world evidence in Brazil: regulatory gaps and global lessons

Regulatory agencies are increasingly incorporating real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) into decision-making frameworks to complement randomized clinical trials. While some regions, such as the U.S. and EU, have developed structured approaches for RWE use, Brazil's regulatory environment remains comparatively limited. This study examines the status of RWE regulatory integration in Brazil through an analysis of normative documents, institutional publications, and selected case studies, using a comparative policy perspective. Although advances have been made in data standardization and the publication of technical guidelines, such as ANVISA's Guidance No. 64/2023, the practical use of RWE in regulatory processes is still nascent. Key challenges include fragmented data infrastructure, and limited intersectoral coordination. Addressing these gaps will require improved interoperability across health information systems, convergence of methodological standards, and sustained collaboration among regulatory authorities, academia, and data holders to enable consistent and scientifically robust use of RWE in the Brazilian context and, potentially, in other low- and middle-income countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2025.101344
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing real-world evidence in Brazil: regulatory gaps and global lessons

Nélio Cezar de Aquino, Vanderson Rocha, Hebert Fabrício Culler, Cadiele Oliana Reichert et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Advancing real-world evidence in Brazil: regulatory gaps and global lessons

Nélio Cezar de Aquino, Vanderson Rocha, Hebert Fabrício Culler, Cadiele Oliana Reichert, Luís Alberto de Pádua Covas Lage, Juliana Pereira, Felipe Santa Rosa Roitberg, Flávia Neves Rocha Alves
article en

Abstract

Regulatory agencies are increasingly incorporating real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) into decision-making frameworks to complement randomized clinical trials. While some regions, such as the U.S. and EU, have developed structured approaches for RWE use, Brazil's regulatory environment remains comparatively limited. This study examines the status of RWE regulatory integration in Brazil through an analysis of normative documents, institutional publications, and selected case studies, using a comparative policy perspective. Although advances have been made in data standardization and the publication of technical guidelines, such as ANVISA's Guidance No. 64/2023, the practical use of RWE in regulatory processes is still nascent. Key challenges include fragmented data infrastructure, and limited intersectoral coordination. Addressing these gaps will require improved interoperability across health information systems, convergence of methodological standards, and sustained collaboration among regulatory authorities, academia, and data holders to enable consistent and scientifically robust use of RWE in the Brazilian context and, potentially, in other low- and middle-income countries.

The Lancet Regional Health - AmericasVol. 55
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Micro and Small Enterprises Support Service (BR), Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz (BR), National Water Agency (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.