Rethinking Impact-based Forecasts and Warnings (IbFW) for multi-risks

Impact-based Forecasts and Warnings (IbFWs) are crucial for disaster risk reduction; however, most systems focus on single hazards, overlooking the complex interactions of multi-risk events. This siloed approach can underestimate impacts, especially when hazards occur simultaneously or sequentially. Developing multi-risk IbFW systems requires interdisciplinary collaboration, improved modelling, more impact data and clearer terminology. Analysis of historical disasters shows that multi-hazard events cause disproportionate economic losses. Advancing IbFW systems demands pragmatic innovation, robust datasets, and inclusive strategies to better reflect real-world hazard complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj natural hazards.
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-025-00157-5
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Impact-based Forecasts and Warnings (IbFW) for multi-risks

Emma Brown, Seshagiri Rao Kolusu, Darren Lumbroso, Christopher J. White
npj natural hazards.
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Rethinking Impact-based Forecasts and Warnings (IbFW) for multi-risks

Emma Brown, Seshagiri Rao Kolusu, Darren Lumbroso, Christopher J. White
article en

Abstract

Impact-based Forecasts and Warnings (IbFWs) are crucial for disaster risk reduction; however, most systems focus on single hazards, overlooking the complex interactions of multi-risk events. This siloed approach can underestimate impacts, especially when hazards occur simultaneously or sequentially. Developing multi-risk IbFW systems requires interdisciplinary collaboration, improved modelling, more impact data and clearer terminology. Analysis of historical disasters shows that multi-hazard events cause disproportionate economic losses. Advancing IbFW systems demands pragmatic innovation, robust datasets, and inclusive strategies to better reflect real-world hazard complexity.

npj natural hazards.Vol. 2(1)
Met Office (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB), HR Wallingford (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Met Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.