Quality control circles in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An observational study

Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is crucial for restoring athletic function. The Quality Control Circle (QCC), known for promoting continuous improvement in various medical fields, may improve outcomes following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). This study evaluates the effectiveness of a QCC-guided rehabilitation approach in patients following ACLR. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 142 patients who underwent ACLR, divided into 2 groups based on their rehabilitation period. The control group (n = 71) received conventional rehabilitation. The experimental group underwent rehabilitation guided by the QCC. Both groups were assessed at 2, 4, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-rehabilitation for Lysholm knee function scores, Visual Analog Scale, proprioception at knee joint angles of 15°, 35°, and 75°, peak torque relative to body weight (PT/BW), flexion (PTflex), and extension peak torque values, and hamstring-to-quadriceps strength ratio. Patient improvement rate, participation rate, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, recurrence rate, rehabilitation efficiency, adverse event rate, and adherence to guidelines were also evaluated through questionnaires. At 2 weeks, the experimental group showed significantly higher proprioception at 35° and 75° knee joint angles, PTflex, hamstring-to-quadriceps strength ratio, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, rehabilitation efficiency, and adherence to guidelines compared to the control group (P < .05). At 4 weeks, improvements were noted in proprioception at 15°, 35°, and 75° angles, PTflex, peak torque extension, improvement rate, participation rate, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, rehabilitation efficiency, and adherence to guidelines (P < .05). At 8 weeks, the experimental group outperformed the control group in Lysholm knee scores, PT/BW ratio, proprioception at 35° and 75° angles, improvement rate, participation rate, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, rehabilitation efficiency, and adherence to guidelines (P < .05). By 6 months, significant improvements were seen in the Visual Analog Scale, PT/BW ratio, proprioception at 35° and 75° angles in the experimental group compared to the control (P < .05). Implementing the QCC method in post-ACLR rehabilitation significantly enhances knee joint function, reduces pain, improves proprioception and muscle strength, and increases patient satisfaction and engagement. This approach provides an effective rehabilitation model for ACLR patients by promoting interdisciplinary team collaboration and continuous quality improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000046752
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality control circles in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An observational study

Shuyan Qie, Chao Liang, Baoyi Wang, Panpan Chen et al.
Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Quality control circles in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An observational study

Shuyan Qie, Chao Liang, Baoyi Wang, Panpan Chen, Xiu Liu, Han Cai, Lishuang Liu, Hujun Wang
article en

Abstract

Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is crucial for restoring athletic function. The Quality Control Circle (QCC), known for promoting continuous improvement in various medical fields, may improve outcomes following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). This study evaluates the effectiveness of a QCC-guided rehabilitation approach in patients following ACLR. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 142 patients who underwent ACLR, divided into 2 groups based on their rehabilitation period. The control group (n = 71) received conventional rehabilitation. The experimental group underwent rehabilitation guided by the QCC. Both groups were assessed at 2, 4, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-rehabilitation for Lysholm knee function scores, Visual Analog Scale, proprioception at knee joint angles of 15°, 35°, and 75°, peak torque relative to body weight (PT/BW), flexion (PTflex), and extension peak torque values, and hamstring-to-quadriceps strength ratio. Patient improvement rate, participation rate, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, recurrence rate, rehabilitation efficiency, adverse event rate, and adherence to guidelines were also evaluated through questionnaires. At 2 weeks, the experimental group showed significantly higher proprioception at 35° and 75° knee joint angles, PTflex, hamstring-to-quadriceps strength ratio, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, rehabilitation efficiency, and adherence to guidelines compared to the control group (P < .05). At 4 weeks, improvements were noted in proprioception at 15°, 35°, and 75° angles, PTflex, peak torque extension, improvement rate, participation rate, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, rehabilitation efficiency, and adherence to guidelines (P < .05). At 8 weeks, the experimental group outperformed the control group in Lysholm knee scores, PT/BW ratio, proprioception at 35° and 75° angles, improvement rate, participation rate, satisfaction score, willingness to recommend, rehabilitation efficiency, and adherence to guidelines (P < .05). By 6 months, significant improvements were seen in the Visual Analog Scale, PT/BW ratio, proprioception at 35° and 75° angles in the experimental group compared to the control (P < .05). Implementing the QCC method in post-ACLR rehabilitation significantly enhances knee joint function, reduces pain, improves proprioception and muscle strength, and increases patient satisfaction and engagement. This approach provides an effective rehabilitation model for ACLR patients by promoting interdisciplinary team collaboration and continuous quality improvement.

MedicineVol. 104(51)
Asia University (TW), Capital Medical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), China Rehabilitation Research Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.