Putting female jockeys in their place

Abstract Gender bias and discrimination within labour markets is a significant area of concern in many industries yet it represents an inherently difficult field for empirical analysis. Infrequent hiring events and complexities in obtaining truly objective measures of productivity, often coupled with under-representation of females, severely limits data availability in most workplace settings. Using a novel approach, we take advantage of the frequent hiring events within the sport of horse racing to evaluate productivity against opportunities afforded to individual jockeys. Our ranking model identifies under- and over-valued jockeys, and we find that women are significantly more likely to be under-used than males, in an industry in which performance data are readily available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnaf200
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting female jockeys in their place

Vanessa Cashmore, Benjamin Holmes, Ian G. McHale
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Putting female jockeys in their place

Vanessa Cashmore, Benjamin Holmes, Ian G. McHale
article en

Abstract

Abstract Gender bias and discrimination within labour markets is a significant area of concern in many industries yet it represents an inherently difficult field for empirical analysis. Infrequent hiring events and complexities in obtaining truly objective measures of productivity, often coupled with under-representation of females, severely limits data availability in most workplace settings. Using a novel approach, we take advantage of the frequent hiring events within the sport of horse racing to evaluate productivity against opportunities afforded to individual jockeys. Our ranking model identifies under- and over-valued jockeys, and we find that women are significantly more likely to be under-used than males, in an industry in which performance data are readily available.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
University of Liverpool (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.