Overview of waterborne protozoa in Latin American water samples, detection methods and water treatment

Waterborne protozoa are a public health concern worldwide, affecting mostly low- and middle-income countries. In Latin American (LA) countries, poor sanitation and inefficient water treatment increase the risk of waterborne outbreaks. In this context, this research evaluated 85 peer-reviewed papers, addressing the occurrence of waterborne protozoa in water samples in LA countries. This study aims to provide relevant information about the protozoa detected, their basic characteristics, detection methods used, and treatment techniques studied entirely within the LA background to support decision-making. According to the results, the presence of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., Entamoeba spp., Blastocystis spp., Toxoplasma gondii , Cyclospora spp., Cystoisospora spp. and Trichomonas spp. in raw, treated and recreational water was detected. Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. were addressed in 70.5% of studies, mainly in Brazil and Argentina. Among water samples assessed, raw water was the most evaluated (83.5%), followed by treated water (42.3%) and recreational water (4.7%). The steps for concentrating, purifying, and detecting protozoa varied among the LA research groups; however, most of them used membrane/cartridge filtration and immunofluorescence microscopy, and the purification step was applied in only 41% of studies. It was found that few LA research groups (11.7%) evaluated water treatment for protozoa inactivation, in which chlorine disinfection was the most commonly reported technique. Water samples from LA countries have revealed the presence of waterborne protozoa, underscoring the need for investments in water and sanitation services, as well as improved detection methods for surveillance and control. • Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. are the most studied protozoa in LA countries • Entamoeba spp., T. gondii and emerging protozoa have been identified in water samples • Waterborne protozoa were detected in raw, treated, and recreational water samples • Filtration and immunofluorescence microscopy are the most used detection methods • Urgent need for improving water and sanitation infrastructures and protozoa detection methods in LA countries

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Microbe
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microb.2025.100650
Primary Topic
Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overview of waterborne protozoa in Latin American water samples, detection methods and water treatment

Lucas Ariel Totaro Garcia, Natália de Melo Nasser Fava, James Stephen Gerard Dooley, Paulo Marcos Faria Maciel et al.
The Microbe
Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
article

Overview of waterborne protozoa in Latin American water samples, detection methods and water treatment

Lucas Ariel Totaro Garcia, Natália de Melo Nasser Fava, James Stephen Gerard Dooley, Paulo Marcos Faria Maciel, Fernando Lindo Silva, William John Snelling, Lyda Patrícia Sabogal-Paz, Vanessa Colombo‐Corbi, Maria Júlia Rodrigues da Cunha
article en

Abstract

Waterborne protozoa are a public health concern worldwide, affecting mostly low- and middle-income countries. In Latin American (LA) countries, poor sanitation and inefficient water treatment increase the risk of waterborne outbreaks. In this context, this research evaluated 85 peer-reviewed papers, addressing the occurrence of waterborne protozoa in water samples in LA countries. This study aims to provide relevant information about the protozoa detected, their basic characteristics, detection methods used, and treatment techniques studied entirely within the LA background to support decision-making. According to the results, the presence of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., Entamoeba spp., Blastocystis spp., Toxoplasma gondii , Cyclospora spp., Cystoisospora spp. and Trichomonas spp. in raw, treated and recreational water was detected. Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. were addressed in 70.5% of studies, mainly in Brazil and Argentina. Among water samples assessed, raw water was the most evaluated (83.5%), followed by treated water (42.3%) and recreational water (4.7%). The steps for concentrating, purifying, and detecting protozoa varied among the LA research groups; however, most of them used membrane/cartridge filtration and immunofluorescence microscopy, and the purification step was applied in only 41% of studies. It was found that few LA research groups (11.7%) evaluated water treatment for protozoa inactivation, in which chlorine disinfection was the most commonly reported technique. Water samples from LA countries have revealed the presence of waterborne protozoa, underscoring the need for investments in water and sanitation services, as well as improved detection methods for surveillance and control. • Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. are the most studied protozoa in LA countries • Entamoeba spp., T. gondii and emerging protozoa have been identified in water samples • Waterborne protozoa were detected in raw, treated, and recreational water samples • Filtration and immunofluorescence microscopy are the most used detection methods • Urgent need for improving water and sanitation infrastructures and protozoa detection methods in LA countries

The MicrobeVol. 10
University of Ulster (GB), Institute of Physics (PL), Centro Universitário de Araraquara (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.