Scaffolding Futures Making: Facilitating a More Democratizing Futuring Practice

In this article, we develop a conceptual framework for democratizing futures making, a practice often dominated by corporate and professional elites. We argue that more inclusive participation requires a deeper engagement with the pedagogical dimensions of how people come to imagine, explore, and shape the future together. To this end, we introduce scaffolding as a structured approach to futures making through embedded, embodied, and emergent processes. In the first section, we critically examine futures literacy as an approach to democratizing futures making and show why its cognitivist and linguistic focus is limited. Drawing on design theory and organizational theory, we outline how a new materialist perspective offers a more viable alternative. In the second section, we revisit scaffolding as a pedagogical metaphor used to organize learning, reframing it through materialist perspectives to avoid prescriptive interpretations. In the final section, we describe how scaffolding can be put into practice as part of futures making. • A clearer conceptualization of how pedagogy can support the democratization of futures making. • Although futures literacy offers useful insights for teaching futures making, it relies too heavily on cognitive and linguistic models that overlook the material and grounded aspects of collective aspiration. • The traditional pedagogical metaphor of scaffolding often emphasizes instructor control and learner passivity, despite its learner-centered origins. • Drawing on new materialist interpretations, the article advances a socio-material understanding of scaffolding in which futures making involves learning that is embedded, embodied, and emergent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
She ji
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2025.10.001
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaffolding Futures Making: Facilitating a More Democratizing Futuring Practice

Gillian Russell, Samein Shamsher, Frédérik Lesage
She ji
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Scaffolding Futures Making: Facilitating a More Democratizing Futuring Practice

Gillian Russell, Samein Shamsher, Frédérik Lesage
article en

Abstract

In this article, we develop a conceptual framework for democratizing futures making, a practice often dominated by corporate and professional elites. We argue that more inclusive participation requires a deeper engagement with the pedagogical dimensions of how people come to imagine, explore, and shape the future together. To this end, we introduce scaffolding as a structured approach to futures making through embedded, embodied, and emergent processes. In the first section, we critically examine futures literacy as an approach to democratizing futures making and show why its cognitivist and linguistic focus is limited. Drawing on design theory and organizational theory, we outline how a new materialist perspective offers a more viable alternative. In the second section, we revisit scaffolding as a pedagogical metaphor used to organize learning, reframing it through materialist perspectives to avoid prescriptive interpretations. In the final section, we describe how scaffolding can be put into practice as part of futures making. • A clearer conceptualization of how pedagogy can support the democratization of futures making. • Although futures literacy offers useful insights for teaching futures making, it relies too heavily on cognitive and linguistic models that overlook the material and grounded aspects of collective aspiration. • The traditional pedagogical metaphor of scaffolding often emphasizes instructor control and learner passivity, despite its learner-centered origins. • Drawing on new materialist interpretations, the article advances a socio-material understanding of scaffolding in which futures making involves learning that is embedded, embodied, and emergent.

She jiVol. 11(4)
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scaffolding Futures Making: Facilitating a More Democratizing Futuring Practice — Gillian Russell, Samein Shamsher, et al. · She ji (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS