A feasibility study using the ETL CoronaCheck® device to identify incident cases of SARS-CoV-2: FIND SARS-CoV-2

The feasibility of using a novel, non-invasive breath-based diagnostic test for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated in a real-world clinical setting. The study aimed to assess the device's performance, usability and integration into routine point-of-care pathways, while also obtaining preliminary diagnostic accuracy metrics to inform future validation studies. This was a cross-sectional study performed in a single National Health Service hospital. Participants in cohort A were recruited with prior knowledge of their PCR swab results. Cohort B were sequential participants in a prospective 'real-world' evaluation. 385 participants were recruited, with 214 participants achieving a suitable sample for analysis. Of 179 participants in cohort A, 60 (33.5%) had clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 confirmed with a positive PCR swab, 31 (17.3%) had clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2, but a negative PCR swab, 22 (12.3%) were asymptomatic but with a positive PCR swab and 66 (36.9%) had a low clinical suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 and negative PCR swab. Across all participants with a suitable sample for analysis, the Exhalation Technology Limited (ETL) CoronaCheck® had a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 96%. Cohen's<i>K</i>score confirmed an excellent agreement between a positive vs negative CoronaCheck outcome against a positive vs negative PCR result (<i>k</i>= 0.990, 99%, SE:0.10). The CoronaCheck demonstrated an excellent predictive value for a positive PCR result, with low variability (both cohorts: ROC = 0.98 (CI:94%-100%)). Most participants (88%) reported the CoronaCheck was easy to use, highlighting its potential utility in clinical practice. This study demonstrates it is feasible to use exhaled breath condensate and the ETL CoronaCheck® device to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a rapid point-of-care test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Breath Research
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ae2f94
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A feasibility study using the ETL CoronaCheck® device to identify incident cases of SARS-CoV-2: FIND SARS-CoV-2

Thomas Brown, Jonathan Brown, Anoop Chauhan, Rebecca Stores et al.
Journal of Breath Research
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

A feasibility study using the ETL CoronaCheck® device to identify incident cases of SARS-CoV-2: FIND SARS-CoV-2

Thomas Brown, Jonathan Brown, Anoop Chauhan, Rebecca Stores, Sharon Glaysher, Milan Chauhan, Sarah Akbar, Jane Michelle Williams, Lauren Fox, Jie Zhou
article en

Abstract

The feasibility of using a novel, non-invasive breath-based diagnostic test for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated in a real-world clinical setting. The study aimed to assess the device's performance, usability and integration into routine point-of-care pathways, while also obtaining preliminary diagnostic accuracy metrics to inform future validation studies. This was a cross-sectional study performed in a single National Health Service hospital. Participants in cohort A were recruited with prior knowledge of their PCR swab results. Cohort B were sequential participants in a prospective 'real-world' evaluation. 385 participants were recruited, with 214 participants achieving a suitable sample for analysis. Of 179 participants in cohort A, 60 (33.5%) had clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 confirmed with a positive PCR swab, 31 (17.3%) had clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2, but a negative PCR swab, 22 (12.3%) were asymptomatic but with a positive PCR swab and 66 (36.9%) had a low clinical suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 and negative PCR swab. Across all participants with a suitable sample for analysis, the Exhalation Technology Limited (ETL) CoronaCheck® had a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 96%. Cohen's<i>K</i>score confirmed an excellent agreement between a positive vs negative CoronaCheck outcome against a positive vs negative PCR result (<i>k</i>= 0.990, 99%, SE:0.10). The CoronaCheck demonstrated an excellent predictive value for a positive PCR result, with low variability (both cohorts: ROC = 0.98 (CI:94%-100%)). Most participants (88%) reported the CoronaCheck was easy to use, highlighting its potential utility in clinical practice. This study demonstrates it is feasible to use exhaled breath condensate and the ETL CoronaCheck® device to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a rapid point-of-care test.

Journal of Breath ResearchVol. 20(1)
University of Wolverhampton (GB), Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Hartpury University (GB), Department for Infrastructure (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.