Attitudes unchanged: no support for increased climate change beliefs, concerns, or voting intentions after Hurricane Helene

Abstract In late September 2024, Hurricane Helene struck the southeastern USA. Occurring only five weeks before the presidential election, did this extreme weather event change US-Americans’ beliefs, concerns, and voting intentions? In a natural quasi-experiment, we examined these potential consequences of Helene. 1155 participants, from affected and non-affected regions, were surveyed one month before and directly after the hurricane. Results revealed negligible changes in climate change beliefs, concerns, and voting intentions. Bayesian analyses found strong support for stability in attitudes. Specifically, it was approximately 13 times more likely that Helene did not increase climate change concerns and about 14 times more likely that it did not strengthen voting intentions for climate policies in affected regions. These results provide a case study showing that attitudes remained unchanged after a severe extreme weather event.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae2f91
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes unchanged: no support for increased climate change beliefs, concerns, or voting intentions after Hurricane Helene

София Скипор, Magnus Bergquist
Environmental Research Communications
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Attitudes unchanged: no support for increased climate change beliefs, concerns, or voting intentions after Hurricane Helene

София Скипор, Magnus Bergquist
article en

Abstract

Abstract In late September 2024, Hurricane Helene struck the southeastern USA. Occurring only five weeks before the presidential election, did this extreme weather event change US-Americans’ beliefs, concerns, and voting intentions? In a natural quasi-experiment, we examined these potential consequences of Helene. 1155 participants, from affected and non-affected regions, were surveyed one month before and directly after the hurricane. Results revealed negligible changes in climate change beliefs, concerns, and voting intentions. Bayesian analyses found strong support for stability in attitudes. Specifically, it was approximately 13 times more likely that Helene did not increase climate change concerns and about 14 times more likely that it did not strengthen voting intentions for climate policies in affected regions. These results provide a case study showing that attitudes remained unchanged after a severe extreme weather event.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 8(1)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Attitudes unchanged: no support for increased climate change beliefs, concerns, or voting intentions after Hurricane Helene — София Скипор, Magnus Bergquist · Environmental Research Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS