The effects of electrical stimulation on neurons and glia of the central nervous system

<i>Objective.</i>This review paper focuses on how both direct current (DC) stimulation and alternating current (AC) stimulation affects the central nervous system's (CNSs) cells and its potential as a neurotherapeutic. Furthermore, addressing the promise of combinatorial approaches that utilize other treatments alongside electrical stimulation (ES) and how ES has shaped clinical approaches as a new rehabilitation treatment.<i>Approach.</i>Authors conducted this review to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical translation; 124 manuscripts were identified through Google Scholar for insights into ES effects on neurons and glia in both<i>in vitro</i>and<i>in vivo</i>models.<i>Main results.</i>The review summarizes findings from DC and AC stimulation paradigms applied to<i>in vitro</i>or<i>in vivo</i>preclinical models and summarizes the promise of ES when applied clinically. Generally, DC stimulation promotes axonal extension towards the cathode, while axons retract at the anode, limiting regeneration. AC stimulation alternates electrode polarity, enabling axonal extension in both directions. The intensity and duration of ES significantly affects the extent of neurite outgrowth. For astrocytes and microglia, ES-whether AC or DC-downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokine production and upregulates anti-inflammatory cytokine production, promoting A2 or M2 reactive states conducive to regeneration, respectively. Regarding oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), both DC and AC stimulation enhance OPC differentiation into oligodendrocytes, increasing myelin content and supporting axonal myelination. ES, when combined with stem cell treatments, drug delivery approaches, or with electroactive biomaterials, facilitate greater efficacy of these approaches. Clinically, short-single sessions of ES have shown long-term improvement. More specifically, preliminary efforts have been implemented to restore gait, hand tremors, and speech in spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's Disease, and stroke patients, respectively.<i>Significance.</i>ES is an evolving neurotherapeutic strategy for CNS related disease or injuries. Understanding how ES modulates neurons and glia is critical for optimizing its application in the clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ae2f9c
Primary Topic
Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of electrical stimulation on neurons and glia of the central nervous system

Ryan J. Gilbert, John P. Devlin
Journal of Neural Engineering
Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
article

The effects of electrical stimulation on neurons and glia of the central nervous system

Ryan J. Gilbert, John P. Devlin
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>This review paper focuses on how both direct current (DC) stimulation and alternating current (AC) stimulation affects the central nervous system's (CNSs) cells and its potential as a neurotherapeutic. Furthermore, addressing the promise of combinatorial approaches that utilize other treatments alongside electrical stimulation (ES) and how ES has shaped clinical approaches as a new rehabilitation treatment.<i>Approach.</i>Authors conducted this review to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical translation; 124 manuscripts were identified through Google Scholar for insights into ES effects on neurons and glia in both<i>in vitro</i>and<i>in vivo</i>models.<i>Main results.</i>The review summarizes findings from DC and AC stimulation paradigms applied to<i>in vitro</i>or<i>in vivo</i>preclinical models and summarizes the promise of ES when applied clinically. Generally, DC stimulation promotes axonal extension towards the cathode, while axons retract at the anode, limiting regeneration. AC stimulation alternates electrode polarity, enabling axonal extension in both directions. The intensity and duration of ES significantly affects the extent of neurite outgrowth. For astrocytes and microglia, ES-whether AC or DC-downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokine production and upregulates anti-inflammatory cytokine production, promoting A2 or M2 reactive states conducive to regeneration, respectively. Regarding oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), both DC and AC stimulation enhance OPC differentiation into oligodendrocytes, increasing myelin content and supporting axonal myelination. ES, when combined with stem cell treatments, drug delivery approaches, or with electroactive biomaterials, facilitate greater efficacy of these approaches. Clinically, short-single sessions of ES have shown long-term improvement. More specifically, preliminary efforts have been implemented to restore gait, hand tremors, and speech in spinal cord injuries, Parkinson's Disease, and stroke patients, respectively.<i>Significance.</i>ES is an evolving neurotherapeutic strategy for CNS related disease or injuries. Understanding how ES modulates neurons and glia is critical for optimizing its application in the clinic.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 23(1)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US), Missouri University of Science and Technology (US), Biochemical Society (GB), Albany Stratton VA Medical Center Albany (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.