Consideration of spatial variability and environmental impacts in the probabilistic design of driven piles

This study presents a probabilistic framework for the axial design of driven pipe piles that incorporates subsurface spatial variability and quantifies the influence of soil heterogeneity on reliability and environmental performance. Traditional geotechnical designs often rely on conservative deterministic parameters that simplify natural variability, resulting in overdesign and increased environmental impact. The applied methodology combines Monte Carlo simulations, random field theory, and the Unified cone penetration testing-based design method to model pile capacity under varying degrees of spatial correlation in relative density ( D R ) profiles. Initial pile geometries were determined using conventional factor of safety (FS) criteria for a homogeneous soil profile. These were then evaluated under uncorrelated, correlated, and uniform subsurface vertical spatial variability scenarios by simulating D R as a lognormally distributed random field with varying mean, coefficient of variation, and correlation length ( θ). The resulting probability of failure ( p f ) for each design was computed and compared to the deterministic FS. The analysis revealed that p f varies by several orders of magnitude for the same FS depending on the assumed spatial structure. A streamlined life cycle assessment indicates that incorporating spatial correlation enables material reductions while maintaining acceptable p f levels, achieving up to 14% global warming potential savings compared to uniform soil profile assumptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0414
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consideration of spatial variability and environmental impacts in the probabilistic design of driven piles

Jason T. DeJong, Dora L. de Melo
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Consideration of spatial variability and environmental impacts in the probabilistic design of driven piles

Jason T. DeJong, Dora L. de Melo
article en

Abstract

This study presents a probabilistic framework for the axial design of driven pipe piles that incorporates subsurface spatial variability and quantifies the influence of soil heterogeneity on reliability and environmental performance. Traditional geotechnical designs often rely on conservative deterministic parameters that simplify natural variability, resulting in overdesign and increased environmental impact. The applied methodology combines Monte Carlo simulations, random field theory, and the Unified cone penetration testing-based design method to model pile capacity under varying degrees of spatial correlation in relative density ( D R ) profiles. Initial pile geometries were determined using conventional factor of safety (FS) criteria for a homogeneous soil profile. These were then evaluated under uncorrelated, correlated, and uniform subsurface vertical spatial variability scenarios by simulating D R as a lognormally distributed random field with varying mean, coefficient of variation, and correlation length ( θ). The resulting probability of failure ( p f ) for each design was computed and compared to the deterministic FS. The analysis revealed that p f varies by several orders of magnitude for the same FS depending on the assumed spatial structure. A streamlined life cycle assessment indicates that incorporating spatial correlation enables material reductions while maintaining acceptable p f levels, achieving up to 14% global warming potential savings compared to uniform soil profile assumptions.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 63
University of California System (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.