Intermediary Use in Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems: Comparing Patterns of Resource Access Among Sustainability And Technological Start-Ups

This paper examines how start-ups mobilise intermediaries to access resources within sustainable and technological innovation ecosystems (SIEs and TIEs). Drawing on a relational chain approach and quantified narrations of 90 sustainability and technological start-ups located in the same geographical area, we identify seven distinct patterns of intermediary use and compare them across the two ecosystem types. We contribute to the innovation ecosystem literature by showing that intermediary engagement follows plural trajectories, departing from the linear pipeline often assumed in ecosystem research. We further identify two contrasting logics of intermediation: emancipation, where ventures rely intensively on intermediaries at early stages and later reduce their dependence, and accumulation, where ventures progressively layer multiple intermediaries over time. Comparing SIEs and TIEs, we uncover the hidden but crucial role of interpersonal intermediaries in IEs, providing a different set of resources to sustainability start-ups, while technological ventures rely more on universities and companies. These results enrich intermediary typologies by adding interpersonal actors and reveal that the same intermediary types enable different bundles of resources depending on the ecosystem context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
M n gement
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2025.11463
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intermediary Use in Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems: Comparing Patterns of Resource Access Among Sustainability And Technological Start-Ups

Frédéric Bally, Thibault Daudigeos, Ludivine Calamel
M n gement
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

Intermediary Use in Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems: Comparing Patterns of Resource Access Among Sustainability And Technological Start-Ups

Frédéric Bally, Thibault Daudigeos, Ludivine Calamel
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how start-ups mobilise intermediaries to access resources within sustainable and technological innovation ecosystems (SIEs and TIEs). Drawing on a relational chain approach and quantified narrations of 90 sustainability and technological start-ups located in the same geographical area, we identify seven distinct patterns of intermediary use and compare them across the two ecosystem types. We contribute to the innovation ecosystem literature by showing that intermediary engagement follows plural trajectories, departing from the linear pipeline often assumed in ecosystem research. We further identify two contrasting logics of intermediation: emancipation, where ventures rely intensively on intermediaries at early stages and later reduce their dependence, and accumulation, where ventures progressively layer multiple intermediaries over time. Comparing SIEs and TIEs, we uncover the hidden but crucial role of interpersonal intermediaries in IEs, providing a different set of resources to sustainability start-ups, while technological ventures rely more on universities and companies. These results enrich intermediary typologies by adding interpersonal actors and reveal that the same intermediary types enable different bundles of resources depending on the ecosystem context.

M n gementVol. 28(5)
Kedge Business School (FR), Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.