Resource limitation in intensively managed agricultural ecosystems compromises reproductive success and increases wing asymmetry in bumble bees

Agricultural intensification reduces the diversity and continuity of floral resources, exposing pollinators to multiple stressors. Although resource limitation is a key driver of pollinator declines, the mechanisms linking environmental conditions to pollinator performance remain unclear. We tested whether alleviating food limitation improves bumble bee colony performance and whether agricultural intensification constrains worker development and reproduction. We hypothesised that supplemental nutrition would enhance colony performance, particularly by reducing developmental instability and enhancing reproductive success, whereas agricultural intensification would negatively affect worker development and reproduction. We placed Bombus terrestris colonies across 24 locations spanning a gradient of agricultural cover and experimentally supplemented a subset with pollen and nectar. We quantified worker body size, wing asymmetry, and reproductive output in relation to supplementation, agricultural cover and floral resources. Food supplementation did not increase body size but reduced wing asymmetry and enhanced reproductive output, indicating that nutritional stress constrains developmental stability and colony fitness. Worker body size declined with increasing agricultural cover across treatments, suggesting a consistent developmental cost of landscape intensification that was not alleviated by additional food provisioning. Furthermore, we found weak evidence for a positive effect of agricultural cover on wing asymmetry and of floral diversity on reproductive success across treatments. These results demonstrate trait-specific responses to environmental stress: nutritional limitation primarily constrains developmental stability and reproduction, whereas worker body size appears to be more strongly shaped by landscape-level conditions. This highlights the importance of maintaining sufficient and continuous floral resources to support pollinator populations in intensively managed agricultural systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2026.110665
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resource limitation in intensively managed agricultural ecosystems compromises reproductive success and increases wing asymmetry in bumble bees

Patrycja Pluta, Mark Frenzel, Bilyana Stoykova Wild, Antonella Soro et al.
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Plant and animal studies
article

Resource limitation in intensively managed agricultural ecosystems compromises reproductive success and increases wing asymmetry in bumble bees

Patrycja Pluta, Mark Frenzel, Bilyana Stoykova Wild, Antonella Soro, Christopher Paul Wild, Oliver Schweiger, Belén Pérez Gallardo, Panagiotis Theodorou, Robert J. Paxton
article en

Abstract

Agricultural intensification reduces the diversity and continuity of floral resources, exposing pollinators to multiple stressors. Although resource limitation is a key driver of pollinator declines, the mechanisms linking environmental conditions to pollinator performance remain unclear. We tested whether alleviating food limitation improves bumble bee colony performance and whether agricultural intensification constrains worker development and reproduction. We hypothesised that supplemental nutrition would enhance colony performance, particularly by reducing developmental instability and enhancing reproductive success, whereas agricultural intensification would negatively affect worker development and reproduction. We placed Bombus terrestris colonies across 24 locations spanning a gradient of agricultural cover and experimentally supplemented a subset with pollen and nectar. We quantified worker body size, wing asymmetry, and reproductive output in relation to supplementation, agricultural cover and floral resources. Food supplementation did not increase body size but reduced wing asymmetry and enhanced reproductive output, indicating that nutritional stress constrains developmental stability and colony fitness. Worker body size declined with increasing agricultural cover across treatments, suggesting a consistent developmental cost of landscape intensification that was not alleviated by additional food provisioning. Furthermore, we found weak evidence for a positive effect of agricultural cover on wing asymmetry and of floral diversity on reproductive success across treatments. These results demonstrate trait-specific responses to environmental stress: nutritional limitation primarily constrains developmental stability and reproduction, whereas worker body size appears to be more strongly shaped by landscape-level conditions. This highlights the importance of maintaining sufficient and continuous floral resources to support pollinator populations in intensively managed agricultural systems.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 411
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Erfurt (DE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Thüringer Aufbaubank (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.