Reactor Design for a Greener Future: Comparing isothermal and adiabatic CO 2 methanation reactors under renewable energy fluctuations

Integrating renewable energy into chemical processes is critical to Shell’s ambition of producing net zero emissions by 2050, and, given the global commercial importance of liquefied natural gas (LNG), finding ways to enhance the efficiency of the methanation process. A key factor is the performance of the methanation reactor under dynamic conditions. This study explores the dynamic behavior of adiabatic and isothermal fixed-bed reactors for carbon dioxide $\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)$ methanation - a key power-to-gas ($\mathrm{P2G}$) pathway that converts renewable (green) hydrogen and captured CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> into synthetic methane. All simulations used the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software COMSOL Multiphysics to build and validate detailed fixed-bed reactor models. These findings offer direct business value by supporting the development of flexible methanation systems that can be directly coupled to intermittent renewable sources. This reduces the capital and operating costs required for storage while enhancing system responsiveness. This study demonstrates the value of multiscale modeling in optimizing methanation reactor performance under dynamic conditions. Both reactor configurations, adiabatic and isothermal, showed good performance under variable load. The time necessary to stabilize for both was under 5 s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icrera66237.2025.11284046
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reactor Design for a Greener Future: Comparing isothermal and adiabatic CO 2 methanation reactors under renewable energy fluctuations

Evren Unsal, Gerald Sprachmann, Francesco Di Franco, Michelle Denise Mattenet
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Reactor Design for a Greener Future: Comparing isothermal and adiabatic CO 2 methanation reactors under renewable energy fluctuations

Evren Unsal, Gerald Sprachmann, Francesco Di Franco, Michelle Denise Mattenet
article en

Abstract

Integrating renewable energy into chemical processes is critical to Shell’s ambition of producing net zero emissions by 2050, and, given the global commercial importance of liquefied natural gas (LNG), finding ways to enhance the efficiency of the methanation process. A key factor is the performance of the methanation reactor under dynamic conditions. This study explores the dynamic behavior of adiabatic and isothermal fixed-bed reactors for carbon dioxide $\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)$ methanation - a key power-to-gas ($\mathrm{P2G}$) pathway that converts renewable (green) hydrogen and captured CO<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> into synthetic methane. All simulations used the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software COMSOL Multiphysics to build and validate detailed fixed-bed reactor models. These findings offer direct business value by supporting the development of flexible methanation systems that can be directly coupled to intermittent renewable sources. This reduces the capital and operating costs required for storage while enhancing system responsiveness. This study demonstrates the value of multiscale modeling in optimizing methanation reactor performance under dynamic conditions. Both reactor configurations, adiabatic and isothermal, showed good performance under variable load. The time necessary to stabilize for both was under 5 s.

Shell (Netherlands) (NL), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.