Seismic performance of various structural configurations for RC building on sloped terrain considering soil-foundation-structure approach

The study aims to evaluate the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings on slopes using soil–foundation–structure (SFS) interaction modeling. This study investigates the seismic performance of different structural configurations for a five-story RC building on sloped terrain, incorporating bracings, shear walls, grade beams, stub columns, strap footings, and hybrid arrangements. Three critical slope locations—toe, crest, and center—at 20° inclination were analyzed using the SFS modeling approach in PLAXIS 3D, incorporating soil nonlinearity. The RC building was modeled to assess the inter-story drift ratio (ISDR) and lateral displacement as performance parameters. Results indicate that structures on sloping ground were much more vulnerable than those on level ground, with bare-frame structures exhibiting the worst seismic performance at all slope locations. Braced and shear wall buildings show remarkable improvements, with up to 90% reduction in both lateral displacement and inter-story drift ratio compared to typical bare-frame systems and hybrid configurations such as the M26 model, achieving reductions in critical shear force and bending moment exploitation ratios by as much as 2.3× and 1.5×, respectively, at the observed column. At the crest, optimal configurations showed a 91% reduction in lateral displacement. For buildings at the center of the slope, certain configurations reduced inter-story drift and roof displacement by up to 79% and 88%. The study provides valuable guidelines for creating seismically resilient structural designs, substantially improving the safety and performance of RC buildings under seismic loads in mountainous terrain. The study aligns with building sustainable cities and resilient communities (Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 9 and 11), which minimize the damage to the infrastructure and reduce social losses in a community. Few studies have been done on the structural configuration of buildings on slopes, where limited guidelines were provided in the Indian Standards. The study includes soil–structure interaction and varies the location of the building based on practical scenarios that prove to be novel research to identify the best possible resilient structural configuration for building construction on slopes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Built Environment
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1709068
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic performance of various structural configurations for RC building on sloped terrain considering soil-foundation-structure approach

S. Prasanth, Devendra Parmar, Nikhilesh Ponnappan, Advaitha Thampi
1 citations
Frontiers in Built Environment
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
article

Seismic performance of various structural configurations for RC building on sloped terrain considering soil-foundation-structure approach

S. Prasanth, Devendra Parmar, Nikhilesh Ponnappan, Advaitha Thampi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings on slopes using soil–foundation–structure (SFS) interaction modeling. This study investigates the seismic performance of different structural configurations for a five-story RC building on sloped terrain, incorporating bracings, shear walls, grade beams, stub columns, strap footings, and hybrid arrangements. Three critical slope locations—toe, crest, and center—at 20° inclination were analyzed using the SFS modeling approach in PLAXIS 3D, incorporating soil nonlinearity. The RC building was modeled to assess the inter-story drift ratio (ISDR) and lateral displacement as performance parameters. Results indicate that structures on sloping ground were much more vulnerable than those on level ground, with bare-frame structures exhibiting the worst seismic performance at all slope locations. Braced and shear wall buildings show remarkable improvements, with up to 90% reduction in both lateral displacement and inter-story drift ratio compared to typical bare-frame systems and hybrid configurations such as the M26 model, achieving reductions in critical shear force and bending moment exploitation ratios by as much as 2.3× and 1.5×, respectively, at the observed column. At the crest, optimal configurations showed a 91% reduction in lateral displacement. For buildings at the center of the slope, certain configurations reduced inter-story drift and roof displacement by up to 79% and 88%. The study provides valuable guidelines for creating seismically resilient structural designs, substantially improving the safety and performance of RC buildings under seismic loads in mountainous terrain. The study aligns with building sustainable cities and resilient communities (Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 9 and 11), which minimize the damage to the infrastructure and reduce social losses in a community. Few studies have been done on the structural configuration of buildings on slopes, where limited guidelines were provided in the Indian Standards. The study includes soil–structure interaction and varies the location of the building based on practical scenarios that prove to be novel research to identify the best possible resilient structural configuration for building construction on slopes.

Frontiers in Built EnvironmentVol. 11
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
VIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.