Locomotion-dependent use of geometric and body cues in humans mapping 3D space

The ability to represent locations across multiple dimensions of space is a core function of cognitive maps. While the influence of boundary-dependent environmental geometry on spatial representations has been extensively studied in 2D spaces, less is known about the role of boundaries for volumetric spatial memory. Research in humans and other animals has demonstrated distinct processing of the vertical and horizontal spatial dimensions, likely related to species-specific modes of locomotion. Here, we investigate whether different locomotion modes, flying and walking, affect the use of vertical boundaries, leading to possibly distinct volumetric representations. In a Virtual Reality experiment, human participants memorized objects within a symmetric 3D enclosure, and then were asked to replace them in either the familiar or geometrically deformed environments. We found that the flying group exhibited lower vertical than horizontal spatial memory precision, whereas the walking group showed the opposite pattern, an effect related to using their body axis as a vertical "ruler". Within deformed environments, object replacements in the flying group followed the predictions from a 3D-extended boundary-vector-cell-like computational model of spatial mapping that treated all boundaries equally, whereas those in the walking condition favored a modified model that prioritized the ground boundary. Our findings suggest that gravity-related movement constraints promote different utilization of geometric and body-related cues, resulting in flexible representations of volumetric space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505613122
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locomotion-dependent use of geometric and body cues in humans mapping 3D space

Volker Reisner, Lars König, Theo Schäfer, Christian F. Doeller et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
article

Locomotion-dependent use of geometric and body cues in humans mapping 3D space

Volker Reisner, Lars König, Theo Schäfer, Christian F. Doeller, Mi-Sun Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The ability to represent locations across multiple dimensions of space is a core function of cognitive maps. While the influence of boundary-dependent environmental geometry on spatial representations has been extensively studied in 2D spaces, less is known about the role of boundaries for volumetric spatial memory. Research in humans and other animals has demonstrated distinct processing of the vertical and horizontal spatial dimensions, likely related to species-specific modes of locomotion. Here, we investigate whether different locomotion modes, flying and walking, affect the use of vertical boundaries, leading to possibly distinct volumetric representations. In a Virtual Reality experiment, human participants memorized objects within a symmetric 3D enclosure, and then were asked to replace them in either the familiar or geometrically deformed environments. We found that the flying group exhibited lower vertical than horizontal spatial memory precision, whereas the walking group showed the opposite pattern, an effect related to using their body axis as a vertical "ruler". Within deformed environments, object replacements in the flying group followed the predictions from a 3D-extended boundary-vector-cell-like computational model of spatial mapping that treated all boundaries equally, whereas those in the walking condition favored a modified model that prioritized the ground boundary. Our findings suggest that gravity-related movement constraints promote different utilization of geometric and body-related cues, resulting in flexible representations of volumetric space.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(51)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ), Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience (NO), University College London (GB), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.