How to differentiate between clinical added value (CAV) V drugs: What are the implications, and what is the access pathway?

Level V clinical added value (CAV) refers to a lack of CAV improvement of a new medicine, as assessed by the French Transparency Committee, compared to a standard of care therapeutic strategy. In 2024, 56% of medicines evaluated in primary registration or extended indication (excluding simplified procedures) were assigned an CAV V, compared with 44% in 2023. Obtaining an CAV V sometimes leads to the product not being available to patients, especially in the event of non-inclusion on the costly drug list for hospital products or after failure of negotiation between the drug manufacturers and the Health Products Economic Committee. The Giens workshops wished to devote a round table to the study of these drugs and analyse the different situations leading to CAV V to make proposals allowing access for patients to these drugs that are the subject of very specific CAV V situations. Three situations could benefit from specific attention: (i) Medicinal products for which the submitted clinical data does not allow the French Health Authority (HAS), at the time of evaluation, to decide on the quantity of clinical effect; (ii) Drugs for which the clinical effect is low or for which clinical relevance is discussed; (iii) Drugs for which no added clinical benefit is demonstrated but for which non-clinical benefits (such as organisational impact on care, or long-term savings) are identifiable. Following the analysis of these different situations and using examples, the members of the round table made eight concrete proposals to allow patients to access these products, in certain blocking situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapies
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2025.10.010
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to differentiate between clinical added value (CAV) V drugs: What are the implications, and what is the access pathway?

Driss Berdaï, Bruno Falissard, Charles Body, Frédéric Chassagnol et al.
Therapies
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

How to differentiate between clinical added value (CAV) V drugs: What are the implications, and what is the access pathway?

Driss Berdaï, Bruno Falissard, Charles Body, Frédéric Chassagnol, Philippe Maugendre, Claire Le Jeunne, Isabelle Borget, Carole Doré, Jean‐François Bergmann, Benjamin Kowalski, Nicolas Schlumberger, Elodie Wilmet, Alexandra Durr, Joumana Hudry
article en

Abstract

Level V clinical added value (CAV) refers to a lack of CAV improvement of a new medicine, as assessed by the French Transparency Committee, compared to a standard of care therapeutic strategy. In 2024, 56% of medicines evaluated in primary registration or extended indication (excluding simplified procedures) were assigned an CAV V, compared with 44% in 2023. Obtaining an CAV V sometimes leads to the product not being available to patients, especially in the event of non-inclusion on the costly drug list for hospital products or after failure of negotiation between the drug manufacturers and the Health Products Economic Committee. The Giens workshops wished to devote a round table to the study of these drugs and analyse the different situations leading to CAV V to make proposals allowing access for patients to these drugs that are the subject of very specific CAV V situations. Three situations could benefit from specific attention: (i) Medicinal products for which the submitted clinical data does not allow the French Health Authority (HAS), at the time of evaluation, to decide on the quantity of clinical effect; (ii) Drugs for which the clinical effect is low or for which clinical relevance is discussed; (iii) Drugs for which no added clinical benefit is demonstrated but for which non-clinical benefits (such as organisational impact on care, or long-term savings) are identifiable. Following the analysis of these different situations and using examples, the members of the round table made eight concrete proposals to allow patients to access these products, in certain blocking situations.

TherapiesVol. 81(1)
Université de Bordeaux (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), United States Agency for International Development (US), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Sanofi (France) (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Novartis (France) (FR), Bristol-Myers Squibb (France) (FR), GlaxoSmithKline (France) (FR), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Institut de Myologie (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire Vision Action Cognition (FR), Recordati (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.